The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Relaxation Optimized Heteronuclear Experiments for Extending the Size Limit of RNA Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide The application of NMR to large RNAs has been limited by the inability to perform heteronuclear correlation experiments essential for resolving overlapping 1 H NMR signals, determining interproton distance restraints and interhelical orientations for structure calculations, and evaluating conformational dynamics. Approaches exploiting 1 H– 13 C correlations that are routinely applied to proteins and small RNAs of ∼60 nucleotides or fewer are impractical for larger RNAs due to rapid dipolar relaxation of protons by their attached carbons. Here we report a 2 H-enhanced, 1 H– 15 N correlation approach that enables atom-specific NMR characterization of much larger RNAs. Purine H8 transverse relaxation rates are reduced ∼20-fold with ribose perdeuteration, enabling efficient magnetization transfer via two-bond 1 H– 15 N couplings. We focus on H8–N9 correlation spectra which benefit from favorable N9 chemical shift anisotropy. Chemical shift assignment is enabled by retention of protons at the C1′ position, which allow measurement of two-bond H1′–N9 and through-space H1′–H8 correlations with only a minor effect on H8 relaxation. The approach is demonstrated for the 232 nucleotide HIV-1 Rev response element, where chemical shift assignments, 15 N-edited nuclear Overhauser effects, and 1 H– 15 N residual dipolar couplings are readily obtained from sensitive, high-resolution spectra. Heteronuclear correlated NMR methods that have been essential for the study of proteins can now be extended to RNAs of at least 78 kDa.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3
Abramson, J., Adler, J., Dunger, J., Evans, R., Green, T., Pritzel, A., Ronneberger, O., Willmore, L., Ballard, A. J., Bambrick, J., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w · Cited by 15,861
Structure of the HIV-1 RNA packaging signal
Keane, S. C., Heng, X., Lu, K., Kharytonchyk, S., Ramakrishnan, V., Carter, G., Barton, S., Hosic, A., Florwick, A., Santos, J., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa9266 · Cited by 278
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 81
- 10.1038/s41576-022-00546-w · DOI
- 10.1016/j.copbio.2016.03.019 · DOI
- 10.1093/emboj/20.14.3617 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-biochem-051410-092902 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2009.02.007 · DOI
- 10.1038/82816 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/embo-reports/kve230 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1072249 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2024.168551 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.abe5650 · DOI
- 10.1002/cbic.200300700 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.abb.2017.06.003 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10858-016-0021-5 · DOI
- 10.1002/anie.201304391 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/27.15.3104 · DOI
- 10.1038/nprot.2007.497 · DOI
- 10.1002/anie.201101743 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10858-007-9167-5 · DOI
- 10.1021/ja0367041 · DOI
- 10.1021/ja0757982 · DOI
- 10.1016/bs.mie.2015.02.002 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkq1361 · DOI
- 10.1002/bip.20650 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10858-011-9544-y · DOI
- 10.1007/s10858-005-0646-2 · DOI
- 10.1021/ja038314k · DOI
- 10.1002/bip.20765 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.94.23.12366 · DOI
- 10.1021/ja980742g · DOI
- 10.1007/s10858-007-9184-4 · DOI
- 10.1002/anie.201904057 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10858-010-9429-5 · DOI
- 10.1021/ja047556x · DOI
- 10.1038/s41592-019-0334-x · DOI
- 10.1007/s10858-017-0132-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.03.074 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00178339 · DOI
- 10.1021/jacs.8b03298 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0076-6879(00)17004-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.03.015 · DOI
- 10.1016/B978-0-12-801122-5.00007-6 · DOI
- 10.1002/cbic.201402130 · DOI
- 10.1023/B:JNMR.0000034358.12599.d1 · DOI
- 10.1016/0022-2364(91)90034-Q · DOI
- 10.1016/0022-2364(89)90152-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmr.2009.12.001 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10858-014-9856-9 · DOI
- 10.1038/nprot.2007.221 · DOI
- 10.1021/ja012485c · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkv313 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00182274 · DOI
- 10.1021/jp0007538 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2013.10.008 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-021-25496-5 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10858-009-9375-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.str.2018.01.001 · DOI
- 10.1021/ja062025p · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmr.2007.04.002 · DOI
- 10.1021/ja901633y · DOI
- 10.1016/S0076-6879(94)39004-5 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10858-010-9441-9 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1016316415261 · DOI
- 10.1006/jmbi.2001.5235 · DOI
- 10.1021/ja400920w · DOI
- 10.1038/4176 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2019.05.002 · DOI
- 10.1002/anie.202000493 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmr.2019.106642 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2013.02.001 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/15.21.8783 · DOI
- 10.1017/S1355838299991033 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10858-015-9967-y · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmr.2006.08.002 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10858-016-0049-6 · DOI
- 10.1007/bf00197809 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10858-012-9683-9 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10858-015-9961-4 · DOI
- 10.1385/1-59259-809-9:353 · DOI
- 10.1021/ja0000908 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Shah, A., Patel, H., Kanjarpane, A., Summers, M. F., & Marchant, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland, Baltimore County (US)
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Marchant, Jan
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2025-03-18
- Volume
- 147
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 11179-11188
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- PMC
- PMC11969551
- OpenAlex
- W4408554107
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 0.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of the American Chemical Society (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Maryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Digital Repository at the University of Maryland (University of Maryland College Park)
- Funders
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01 AI150498, U54 AI17660)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
- Keywords
- dipolar relaxation, chemical shift assignment, residual dipolar couplings, nuclear Overhauser effect, RNA structure determination, RNA conformational dynamics
- MeSH terms
- Nitrogen Isotopes, Nucleic Acid Conformation, RNA, RNA, Viral, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Biomolecular
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review