Cited by 63Electrochemical Analysis and ApplicationsElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionElectrochemical sensors and biosensors

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Electrodeposition of Single Nanometer-Size Pt Nanoparticles at a Tunneling Ultramicroelectrode and Determination of Fast Heterogeneous Kinetics for Ru(NH3)63+ Reduction

Kim, Jiyeon, Bard, Allen J.·2016·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

We studied extremely fast kinetics of an outer-sphere heterogeneous electron transfer (ET) reaction at a single Pt nanoparticle (NP) using the newly adapted Kotecký-Levich (K-L) method. In this work, an electrode was prepared by nucleating and growing a single Pt NP on a tunneling ultramicroelectrode (TUME) that produces 1-40 nm or greater dimensions. Such a small-size electrode greatly enhances the mass transfer rate, thus enabling us to reliably determine ET kinetic parameters for fast ET reactions. Based on the recently demonstrated K-L model for a general UME, ET kinetic information could be measured by constructing a plot of 1/current density vs 1/mass transfer rate from the series of steady-state voltammograms obtained using Pt NP-deposited TUMEs. For this K-L plot, we altered the mass transfer rates by varying the electrode size, i.e., the Pt NP size in this work. The determined standard rate constant, k(0), of heterogeneous reduction reaction for Ru(NH3)6(3+) was unprecedentedly high, at 36 ± 4 cm/s, confirmed by theoretical simulation. Extended applications to various electrocatalytic reactions with different types of electrodeposited metal NPs will show the versatility of our approach. Particularly, this novel fabrication of a nanometer-sized electrode and its application to fast ET kinetic study with simple instrumentation should be useful in studies of particle size and structure effects on given catalytic reactions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jacs.5b11655

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Still being checked.

Metadata

Authors
Kim, J., & Bard, A. J.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Bard, Allen J.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2016-01-15
Volume
138
Issue
3
Pages
975-979
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2222587405
Cited by
63
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7
FWCI
7.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Chemical Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Welch Foundation (F-0021)
  • Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-14-1-0003)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Electrochemistry › Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
Keywords
platinum nanoparticles, heterogeneous electron transfer kinetics, outer-sphere electron transfer, mass transfer rate, electrodeposition, nanoparticle size effects, electrocatalysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review