Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 784

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Catalysis in a Cage: Condition-Dependent Speciation and Dynamics of Exchanged Cu Cations in SSZ-13 Zeolites

Paolucci, Christopher, Parekh, Atish A., Khurana, Ishant, Di Iorio, John R., Li, Hui, Albarracin Caballero, Jonatan D., Shih, Arthur J., Anggara, Trunojoyo, Delgass, W. Nicholas, Miller, Jeffrey T., Ribeiro, Fabio H., Gounder, Rajamani, Schneider, William F.·2016·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

The relationships among the macroscopic compositional parameters of a Cu-exchanged SSZ-13 zeolite catalyst, the types and numbers of Cu active sites, and activity for the selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of NOx with NH3 are established through experimental interrogation and computational analysis of materials across the catalyst composition space. Density functional theory, stochastic models, and experimental characterizations demonstrate that within the synthesis protocols applied here and across Si:Al ratios, the volumetric density of six-membered-rings (6MR) containing two Al (2Al sites) is consistent with a random Al siting in the SSZ-13 lattice subject to Löwenstein's rule. Further, exchanged Cu(II) ions first populate these 2Al sites before populating remaining unpaired, or 1Al, sites as Cu(II)OH. These sites are distinguished and enumerated ex situ through vibrational and X-ray absorption spectroscopies (XAS) and chemical titrations. In situ and operando XAS follow Cu oxidation state and coordination environment as a function of environmental conditions including low-temperature (473 K) SCR catalysis and are rationalized through first-principles thermodynamics and ab initio molecular dynamics. Experiment and theory together reveal that the Cu sites respond sensitively to exposure conditions, and in particular that Cu species are solvated and mobilized by NH3 under SCR conditions. While Cu sites are spectroscopically and chemically distinct away from these conditions, they exhibit similar turnover rates, apparent activation energies and apparent reaction orders at the SCR conditions, even on zeolite frameworks other than SSZ13.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jacs.6b02651

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 784

Metadata

Authors
Paolucci, C., Parekh, A. A., Khurana, I., Di Iorio, J. R., Li, H., Albarracin Caballero, J. D., Shih, A. J., Anggara, T., Delgass, W. N., Miller, J. T., Ribeiro, F. H., Gounder, R., & Schneider, W. F.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2016-04-29
Volume
138
Issue
18
Pages
6028-6048
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2337591994
Cited by
784
References
9
FWCI
27.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Catalysis in a Cage: Condition-Dependent Speciation and Dynamics of Exchanged Cu Cations in SSZ-13 Zeolites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jacs.6b02651
The paper
Paolucci, C., Parekh, A. A., Khurana, I., Di Iorio, J. R., Li, H., Albarracin Caballero, J. D., Shih, A. J., Anggara, T., Delgass, W. N., Miller, J. T., Ribeiro, F. H., Gounder, R., & Schneider, W. F. (2016). Catalysis in a Cage: Condition-Dependent Speciation and Dynamics of Exchanged Cu Cations in SSZ-13 Zeolites. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b02651

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.