The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What Controls the Rate of Ultrafast Charge Transfer and Charge Separation Efficiency in Organic Photovoltaic Blends
Open accessAbstract
In solar energy harvesting devices based on molecular semiconductors, such as organic photovoltaics (OPVs) and artificial photosynthetic systems, Frenkel excitons must be dissociated via charge transfer at heterojunctions to yield free charges. What controls the rate and efficiency of charge transfer and charge separation is an important question, as it determines the overall power conversion efficiency (PCE) of these systems. In bulk heterojunctions between polymer donor and fullerene acceptors, which provide a model system to understand the fundamental dynamics of electron transfer in molecular systems, it has been established that the first step of photoinduced electron transfer can be fast, of order 100 fs. But here we report the first study which correlates differences in the electron transfer rate with electronic structure and morphology, achieved with sub-20 fs time resolution pump-probe spectroscopy. We vary both the fullerene substitution and donor/fullerene ratio which allow us to control both aggregate size and the energetic driving force for charge transfer. We observe a range of electron transfer times from polymer to fullerene, from 240 fs to as short as 37 fs. Using ultrafast electro-optical pump-push-photocurrent spectroscopy, we find the yield of free versus bound charges to be weakly dependent on the energetic driving force, but to be very strongly dependent on fullerene aggregate size and packing. Our results point toward the importance of state accessibility and charge delocalization and suggest that energetic offsets between donor and acceptor levels are not an important criterion for efficient charge generation. This provides design rules for next-generation materials to minimize losses related to driving energy and boost PCE.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Entropy of Charge Separation in Organic Photovoltaic Cells: The Benefit of Higher Dimensionality
Gregg, B. A. (2011) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/jz2012403 · Cited by 245
Cited by
Organic Photovoltaics over Three Decades
Inganäs, O. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201800388 · Cited by 708
Understanding Energy Loss in Organic Solar Cells: Toward a New Efficiency Regime
Menke, S. M., Ran, N. A., Bazan, G. C., & Friend, R. H. (2018) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2017.09.020 · Cited by 630
Self-citationWang, R., Zhang, C., Li, Q., Zhang, Z., Wang, X., & Xiao, M. (2020) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.0c04890 · Cited by 474
Metadata
- Authors
- Jakowetz, A. C., Böhm, M. L., Zhang, J., Sadhanala, A., Huettner, S., Bakulin, A. A., Rao, A., & Friend, R. H.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-09-02
- Volume
- 138
- Issue
- 36
- Pages
- 11672-11679
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2508936693
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What Controls the Rate of Ultrafast Charge Transfer and Charge Separation Efficiency in Organic Photovoltaic Blends. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jacs.6b05131
- The paper
- Jakowetz, A. C., Böhm, M. L., Zhang, J., Sadhanala, A., Huettner, S., Bakulin, A. A., Rao, A., & Friend, R. H. (2016). What Controls the Rate of Ultrafast Charge Transfer and Charge Separation Efficiency in Organic Photovoltaic Blends. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b05131
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.