The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DNA Clutch Probes for Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis
Abstract
Progress toward the development of minimally invasive liquid biopsies of disease is being bolstered by breakthroughs in the analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA): DNA released from cancer cells into the bloodstream. However, robust, sensitive, and specific methods of detecting this emerging analyte are lacking. ctDNA analysis has unique challenges, since it is imperative to distinguish circulating DNA from normal cells vs mutation-bearing sequences originating from tumors. Here we report the electrochemical detection of mutated ctDNA in samples collected from cancer patients. By developing a strategy relying on the use of DNA clutch probes (DCPs) that render specific sequences of ctDNA accessible, we were able to readout the presence of mutated ctDNA. DCPs prevent reassociation of denatured DNA strands: they make one of the two strands of a dsDNA accessible for hybridization to a probe, and they also deactivate other closely related sequences in solution. DCPs ensure thereby that only mutated sequences associate with chip-based sensors detecting hybridization events. The assay exhibits excellent sensitivity and specificity in the detection of mutated ctDNA: it detects 1 fg/μL of a target mutation in the presence of 100 pg/μL of wild-type DNA, corresponding to detecting mutations at a level of 0.01% relative to wild type. This approach allows accurate analysis of samples collected from lung cancer and melanoma patients. This work represents the first detection of ctDNA without enzymatic amplification.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An ultrasensitive method for quantitating circulating tumor DNA with broad patient coverage
Newman, A. M., Bratman, S. V., To, J., Wynne, J. F., Eclov, N. C. W., Modlin, L. A., Liu, C. L., Neal, J. W., Wakelee, H. A., Merritt, R. E., et al. (2014) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.3519 · Cited by 2,220
Thress, K. S., Paweletz, C. P., Felip, E., Cho, B. C., Stetson, D., Dougherty, B., Lai, Z., Markovets, A., Vivancos, A., Kuang, Y., et al. (2015) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.3854 · Cited by 1,589
Kelley, S. O., Mirkin, C. A., Walt, D. R., Ismagilov, R. F., Toner, M., & Sargent, E. H. (2014) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2014.261 · Cited by 398
Self-citation
Cited by
Gorgannezhad, L., Umer, M., Islam, M. N., Nguyen, N.-T., & Shiddiky, M. J. A. (2018) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c8lc00100f · Cited by 312
The Promise of Nanotechnology in Personalized Medicine
Alghamdi, M. A., Fallica, A. N., Virzì, N., Kesharwani, P., Pittalà, V., & Greish, K. (2022) · Journal of Personalized Medicine · doi:10.3390/jpm12050673 · Cited by 284
Nucleic Acid Tests for Clinical Translation
Li, M., Yin, F., Song, L., Mao, X., Li, F., Fan, C., Zuo, X., & Xia, Q. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00241 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Das, J., Ivanov, I., Sargent, E. H., & Kelley, S. O.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-08-19
- Volume
- 138
- Issue
- 34
- Pages
- 11009-11016
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2511420722
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 11.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DNA Clutch Probes for Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jacs.6b05679
- The paper
- Das, J., Ivanov, I., Sargent, E. H., & Kelley, S. O. (2016). DNA Clutch Probes for Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b05679
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.