The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Periodic Trends in Olefin Epoxidation over Group IV and V Framework-Substituted Zeolite Catalysts: A Kinetic and Spectroscopic Study
Abstract
Group IV and V framework-substituted zeolites have been used for olefin epoxidation reactions for decades, yet the underlying properties that determine the selectivities and turnover rates of these catalysts have not yet been elucidated. Here, a combination of kinetic, thermodynamic, and in situ spectroscopic measurements show that when group IV (i.e., Ti, Zr, and Hf) or V (i.e., Nb and Ta) transition metals are substituted into zeolite *BEA, the metals that form stronger Lewis acids give greater selectivities and rates for the desired epoxidation pathway and present smaller enthalpic barriers for both epoxidation and H 2 O 2 decomposition reactions. In situ UV–vis spectroscopy shows that these group IV and V materials activate H 2 O 2 to form pools of hydroperoxide, peroxide, and superoxide intermediates. Time-resolved UV–vis measurements and the isomeric distributions of Z -stilbene epoxidation products demonstrate that the active species for epoxidations on group IV and V transition metals are only M-OOH/-(O 2 ) 2– and M-(O 2 ) − species, respectively. Mechanistic interpretations of kinetic data suggest that these group IV and V materials catalyze cyclohexene epoxidation and H 2 O 2 decomposition through largely identical Eley–Rideal mechanisms that involve the irreversible activation of coordinated H 2 O 2 followed by reaction with an olefin or H 2 O 2 . Epoxidation rates and selectivities vary over five- and two-orders of magnitude, respectively, among these catalysts and depend exponentially on the energy for ligand-to-metal charge transfer (LMCT) and the functional Lewis acid strength of the metal centers. Together, these observations show that more electrophilic active-oxygen species (i.e., lower-energy LMCT) are more reactive and selective for epoxidations of electron-rich olefins and explain why Ti-based catalysts have been identified as the most active among early transition metals for these reactions. Further, H 2 O 2 decomposition (the undesirable reaction pathway) possesses a weaker dependence on Lewis acidity than epoxidation, which suggests that the design of catalysts with increased Lewis acid strength will simultaneously increase the reactivity and selectivity of olefin epoxidation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Zhang, S., Xia, Z., Zou, Y., Cao, F., Liu, Y., Ma, Y., & Qu, Y. (2019) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.9b03217 · Cited by 304
Influence of solvent structure and hydrogen bonding on catalysis at solid–liquid interfaces
Potts, D. S., Bregante, D. T., Adams, J. S., Torres, C., & Flaherty, D. W. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d1cs00539a · Cited by 190
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bregante, D. T., & Flaherty, D. W.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2017-05-09
- Volume
- 139
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 6888-6898
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2608329375
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Periodic Trends in Olefin Epoxidation over Group IV and V Framework-Substituted Zeolite Catalysts: A Kinetic and Spectroscopic Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jacs.7b01422
- The paper
- Bregante, D. T., & Flaherty, D. W. (2017). Periodic Trends in Olefin Epoxidation over Group IV and V Framework-Substituted Zeolite Catalysts: A Kinetic and Spectroscopic Study. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b01422
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.