The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DNA Aptamer-Based Activatable Probes for Photoacoustic Imaging in Living Mice
Open accessAbstract
DNA aptamers are a powerful class of molecules for sensing targets, but have been limited when applied to imaging in living animals because most aptamer probes are fluorescence-based, which limits imaging penetration depth. Photoacoustic (PA) imaging emerged as an alternative to MRI and X-ray tomography in biomedical imaging, due to its ability to afford high-resolution images at depths in the cm range. Despite its promise, PA imaging is limited by a lack of strategies to design selective and activatable probes for targets. To overcome this limitation, we report design and demonstration of PA probes based on DNA aptamers that can hybridize to DNA strands conjugated to a near-infrared fluorophore/quencher pair (IRDye 800CW/IRDye QC-1) with efficient contact quenching. Binding of the target triggered a release of the DNA strand with the quencher and thus relief of the contact quenching, resulting in a change of the PA signal ratio at 780/725 nm. Using thrombin as a model, a relationship was established between the thrombin concentrations and the PA ratio, with a dynamic range of 0-1000 nM and a limit of detection of 112 nM. Finally, in vivo PA imaging studies showed that the PA ratio increased significantly 45 min after injection of thrombin but not with injection of PBS as a vehicle control, demonstrating the first aptamer-based activatable PA probe for advanced molecular imaging in living mice. Since in vitro selection can obtain aptamers selective for many targets, the design demonstrated can be applied for PA imaging of a number of targets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Photoacoustic tomography: In vivo imaging from organelles to organs
Wang, L. V., & Hu, S. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1216210 · Cited by 4,331
Going deeper than microscopy: the optical imaging frontier in biology
Ntziachristos, V. (2010) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1483 · Cited by 1,896
Cited by
Aptamer-based targeted therapy
Zhu, G., & Chen, X. (2018) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2018.08.005 · Cited by 522
McConnell, E. M., Cozma, I., Mou, Q., Brennan, J. D., Lu, Y., & Li, Y. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d1cs00240f · Cited by 477
Self-citationNucleic Acid Aptamers for Molecular Diagnostics and Therapeutics: Advances and Perspectives
Li, L., Xu, S., Yan, H., Li, X., Yazd, H. S., Li, X., Huang, T., Cui, C., Jiang, J., & Tan, W. (2021) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202003563 · Cited by 432
Supramolecular cancer nanotheranostics
Zhou, J., Rao, L., Yu, G., Cook, T. R., Chen, X., & Huang, F. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00011f · Cited by 411
Lake, R. J., Yang, Z., Zhang, J., & Lu, Y. (2019) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00419 · Cited by 281
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, J., Smaga, L. P., Satyavolu, N. S. R., Chan, J., & Lu, Y.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2017-11-17
- Volume
- 139
- Issue
- 48
- Pages
- 17225-17228
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2761428485
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.