Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 251

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Contrasting the Role of Ni/Al2O3 Interfaces in Water–Gas Shift and Dry Reforming of Methane

Foppa, Lucas, Margossian, Tigran, Kim, Sung Min, Müller, Christoph, Copéret, Christophe, Larmier, Kim, Comas-Vives, Aleix·2017·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

Transition metal nanoparticles (NPs) are typically supported on oxides to ensure their stability, which may result in modification of the original NP catalyst reactivity. In a number of cases, this is related to the formation of NP/support interface sites that play a role in catalysis. The metal/support interface effect verified experimentally is commonly ascribed to stronger reactants adsorption or their facile activation on such sites compared to bare NPs, as indicated by DFT-derived potential energy surfaces (PESs). However, the relevance of specific reaction elementary steps to the overall reaction rate depends on the preferred reaction pathways at reaction conditions, which usually cannot be inferred based solely on PES. Hereby, we use a multiscale (DFT/microkinetic) modeling approach and experiments to investigate the reactivity of the Ni/Al 2 O 3 interface toward water–gas shift (WGS) and dry reforming of methane (DRM), two key industrial reactions with common elementary steps and intermediates, but held at significantly different temperatures: 300 vs 650 °C, respectively. Our model shows that despite the more energetically favorable reaction pathways provided by the Ni/Al 2 O 3 interface, such sites may or may not impact the overall reaction rate depending on reaction conditions: the metal/support interface provides the active site for WGS reaction, acting as a reservoir for oxygenated species, while all Ni surface atoms are active for DRM. This is in contrast to what PESs alone indicate. The different active site requirement for WGS and DRM is confirmed by the experimental evaluation of the activity of a series of Al 2 O 3 -supported Ni NP catalysts with different NP sizes (2–16 nm) toward both reactions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jacs.7b08984

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 251

Metadata

Authors
Foppa, L., Margossian, T., Kim, S. M., Müller, C., Copéret, C., Larmier, K., & Comas-Vives, A.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2017-11-14
Volume
139
Issue
47
Pages
17128-17139
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2765188743
Cited by
251
References
1
FWCI
5.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.