The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Critical Nuclei Size, Rate, and Activation Energy of H2 Gas Nucleation
Abstract
Abstract Electrochemical measurements of the nucleation rate of individual H2 bubbles at the surface of Pt nanoelectrodes (radius = 7–41 nm) are used to determine the critical size and geometry of H2 nuclei leading to stable bubbles. Precise knowledge of the H2 concentration at the electrode surface, CH2surf, is obtained by controlled current reduction of H+ in a H2SO4 solution. Induction times of single-bubble nucleation events are measured by stepping the current, to control CH2surf, while monitoring the voltage. We find that gas nucleation follows a first-order rate process; a bubble spontaneously nucleates after a stochastic time delay, as indicated by a sudden voltage spike that results from impeded transport of H+ to the electrode. Hundreds of individual induction times, at different applied currents and using different Pt nanoelectrodes, are used to characterize the kinetics of phase nucleation. The rate of bubble nucleation increases by four orders of magnitude (0.3–2000 s–1) over a very small relative change in CH2surf (0.21–0.26 M, corresponding to a ∼0.025 V increase in driving force). Classical nucleation theory yields thermodynamic radii of curvature for critical nuclei of 4.4 to 5.3 nm, corresponding to internal pressures of 330 to 270 atm, and activation energies for nuclei formation of 14 to 26 kT, respectively. The dependence of nucleation rate on H2 concentration indicates that nucleation occurs by a heterogeneous mechanism, where the nuclei have a contact angle of ∼150° with the electrode surface and contain between 35 and 55 H2 molecules.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Influence of Bubbles on the Energy Conversion Efficiency of Electrochemical Reactors
Angulo, A., van der Linde, P., Gardeniers, H., Modestino, M., & Fernández Rivas, D. (2020) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2020.01.005 · Cited by 958
Gas Bubbles in Electrochemical Gas Evolution Reactions
Zhao, X., Ren, H., & Luo, L. (2019) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b00119 · Cited by 457
Self-citationGas Evolution in Water Electrolysis
Kempler, P. A., Coridan, R. H., & Luo, L. (2024) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00211 · Cited by 289
Perspective and Prospectus on Single-Entity Electrochemistry
Baker, L. A. (2018) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.8b09747 · Cited by 285
Akay, Ö., Bashkatov, A., Coy, E., Eckert, K., Einarsrud, K. E., Friedrich, A., Kimmel, B., Loos, S., Mutschke, G., Röntzsch, L., et al. (2022) · npj Microgravity · doi:10.1038/s41526-022-00239-y · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- German, S. R., Edwards, M. A., Ren, H., & White, H. S.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2018-02-23
- Volume
- 140
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 4047-4053
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2787935955
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Critical Nuclei Size, Rate, and Activation Energy of H2 Gas Nucleation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jacs.7b13457
- The paper
- German, S. R., Edwards, M. A., Ren, H., & White, H. S. (2018). Critical Nuclei Size, Rate, and Activation Energy of H2 Gas Nucleation. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b13457
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.