Cited by 797Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionCatalytic Processes in Materials ScienceCO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts

Edge-Site Engineering of Atomically Dispersed Fe–N4 by Selective C–N Bond Cleavage for Enhanced Oxygen Reduction Reaction Activities

Jiang, Rui, Li, Li, Sheng, Tian, Hu, Gaofei, Chen, Yueguang, Wang, Leyu·2018·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

Single-atom metal-nitrogen-carbon (M-N-C) catalysts have sparked intense interests, but the catalytic contribution of N-bonding environment neighboring M-N 4 sites lacks attention. Herein, a series of Fe-N-C nanoarchitectures have been prepared, which confer adjustable numbers of atomically dispersed Fe-N 4 sites, tunable hierarchical micro-mesoporous structures and intensified exposure of interior active sites. The optimization between Fe-N 4 single sites and carbon matrix delivers superior oxygen reduction reaction activity (half-wave potential of 0.915 V vs RHE in alkaline medium) with remarkable stability and high atom-utilization efficiency (almost 10-fold enhancement). Both experiments and theoretical calculations verified the selective C-N bond cleavage adjacent to Fe center induced by porosity engineering could form edge-hosted Fe-N 4 moieties, and therefore lower the overall oxygen reduction reaction barriers comparing to intact atomic configuration. These findings provide a new pathway for the integrated engineering of geometric and electronic structures of single-atom materials to improve their catalytic performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jacs.8b07294

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jiang, R., Li, L., Sheng, T., Hu, G., Chen, Y., & Wang, L.
Affiliations
  • State Key Laboratory of Chemical Resource Engineering (CN)
  • Anhui Normal University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Chen, Yueguang
  • Wang, Leyu
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2018-08-31
Volume
140
Issue
37
Pages
11594-11598
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2888882000
Cited by
797
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 101 · 2023: 105 · 2022: 125 · 2021: 142 · 2020: 140 · 2019: 70 · 2018: 1
FWCI
20.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Chemical Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China (buctrc201812, buctrc201815)
  • China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2017M620583)
  • Beijing University of Chemical Technology
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (21475007, 21675009, 21701005, 21725501)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
Keywords
Fe-N4 single-atom catalysts, oxygen reduction reaction, C–N bond cleavage, porosity engineering, atom utilization efficiency, alkaline electrocatalysis, metal-nitrogen-carbon catalysts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review