Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 322

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ligand Rigidification for Enhancing the Stability of Metal–Organic Frameworks

Lv, Xiu-Liang, Yuan, Shuai, Xie, Lin-Hua, Darke, Hannah F., Chen, Ya, He, Tao, Dong, Chen, Wang, Bin, Zhang, Yong-Zheng, Li, Jian-Rong, Zhou, Hong-Cai·2019·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have been developing at an unexpected rate over the last two decades. However, the unsatisfactory chemical stability of most MOFs hinders some of the fundamental studies in this field and the implementation of these materials for practical applications. The stability in a MOF framework is mostly believed to rely upon the robustness of the M–L (M = metal ion, L = ligand) coordination bonds. However, the role of organic linkers as agents of stability to the framework, particularly the linker rigidity/flexibility, has been mostly overlooked. In this work, we demonstrate that a ligand-rigidification strategy can enhance the stability of MOFs. Three series of ligand rotamers with the same connectivity but different flexibility were prepared. Thirteen Zr-based MOFs were constructed with the Zr 6 O 4 (OH 4 )(−CO 2 ) n units ( n = 8 or 12) and corresponding ligands. These MOFs allow us to evaluate the influence of ligand rigidity, connectivities, and structure on the stability of the resulting materials. It was found that the rigidity of the ligands in the framework strongly contributes to the stability of corresponding MOFs. Furthermore, water adsorption was performed on some chemically stable MOFs, showing excellent performance. It is expected that more MOFs with excellent stability could be designed and constructed by utilizing this strategy, ultimately promoting the development of MOFs with higher stability for synthetic chemistry and practical applications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jacs.9b02947

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 51 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Lv, X.-L., Yuan, S., Xie, L.-H., Darke, H. F., Chen, Y., He, T., Dong, C., Wang, B., Zhang, Y.-Z., Li, J.-R., & Zhou, H.-C.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2019-06-10
Volume
141
Issue
26
Pages
10283-10293
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2949161121
Cited by
322
References
51
FWCI
10.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ligand Rigidification for Enhancing the Stability of Metal–Organic Frameworks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jacs.9b02947
The paper
Lv, X.-L., Yuan, S., Xie, L.-H., Darke, H. F., Chen, Y., He, T., Dong, C., Wang, B., Zhang, Y.-Z., Li, J.-R., & Zhou, H.-C. (2019). Ligand Rigidification for Enhancing the Stability of Metal–Organic Frameworks. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b02947

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.