The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ionic and Electronic Conduction in TiNb2O7
Open accessAbstract
Abstract TiNb2O7 is a Wadsley–Roth phase with a crystallographic shear structure and is a promising candidate for high-rate lithium ion energy storage. The fundamental aspects of the lithium insertion mechanism and conduction in TiNb2O7, however, are not well-characterized. Herein, experimental and computational insights are combined to understand the inherent properties of bulk TiNb2O7. The results show an increase in electronic conductivity of seven orders of magnitude upon lithiation and indicate that electrons exhibit both localized and delocalized character, with a maximum Curie constant and Li NMR paramagnetic shift near a composition of Li0.60TiNb2O7. Square-planar or distorted-five-coordinate lithium sites are calculated to invert between thermodynamic minima or transition states. Lithium diffusion in the single-redox region (i.e., x ≤ 3 in LixTiNb2O7) is rapid with low activation barriers from NMR and DLi = 10–11 m2 s–1 at the temperature of the observed T1 minima of 525–650 K for x ≥ 0.75. DFT calculations predict that ionic diffusion, like electronic conduction, is anisotropic with activation barriers for lithium hopping of 100–200 meV down the tunnels but ca. 700–1000 meV across the blocks. Lithium mobility is hindered in the multiredox region (i.e., x > 3 in LixTiNb2O7), related to a transition from interstitial-mediated to vacancy-mediated diffusion. Overall, lithium insertion leads to effective n-type self-doping of TiNb2O7 and high-rate conduction, while ionic motion is eventually hindered at high lithiation. Transition-state searching with beyond Li chemistries (Na+, K+, Mg2+) in TiNb2O7 reveals high diffusion barriers of 1–3 eV, indicating that this structure is specifically suited to Li+ mobility.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A fast and robust algorithm for Bader decomposition of charge density
Henkelman, G., Arnaldsson, A., & Jónsson, H. (2006) · Computational Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2005.04.010 · Cited by 10,723
Self-citationReviving the lithium metal anode for high-energy batteries
Lin, D., Liu, Y., & Cui, Y. (2017) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2017.16 · Cited by 6,763
In-operando high-speed tomography of lithium-ion batteries during thermal runaway
Finegan, D. P., Scheel, M., Robinson, J. B., Tjaden, B., Hunt, I., Mason, T. J., Millichamp, J., Di Michiel, M., Offer, G. J., Hinds, G., et al. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7924 · Cited by 844
Cited by
Li, J., Fleetwood, J., Hawley, W. B., & Kays, W. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00565 · Cited by 895
Martins, L. S., Guimarães, L. F., Botelho Junior, A. B., Tenório, J. A. S., & Espinosa, D. C. R. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113091 · Cited by 361
Wang, R., Wang, L., Liu, R., Li, X., Wu, Y., & Ran, F. (2024) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.3c08712 · Cited by 336
Metadata
- Authors
- Griffith, K. J., Seymour, I. D., Hope, M. A., Butala, M. M., Lamontagne, L. K., Preefer, M. B., Koçer, C. P., Henkelman, G., Morris, A. J., Cliffe, M. J., Dutton, S. E., & Grey, C. P.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2019-09-05
- Volume
- 141
- Issue
- 42
- Pages
- 16706-16725
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2971823966
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ionic and Electronic Conduction in TiNb2O7. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jacs.9b06669
- The paper
- Griffith, K. J., Seymour, I. D., Hope, M. A., Butala, M. M., Lamontagne, L. K., Preefer, M. B., Koçer, C. P., Henkelman, G., Morris, A. J., Cliffe, M. J., Dutton, S. E., & Grey, C. P. (2019). Ionic and Electronic Conduction in TiNb2O7. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b06669
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.