Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 249

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ionic and Electronic Conduction in TiNb2O7

Open access
Griffith, Kent J., Seymour, Ieuan D., Hope, Michael A., Butala, Megan M., Lamontagne, Leo K., Preefer, Molleigh B., Koçer, Can P., Henkelman, Graeme, Morris, Andrew J., Cliffe, Matthew J., Dutton, Siân E., Grey, Clare P.·2019·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

Abstract TiNb2O7 is a Wadsley–Roth phase with a crystallographic shear structure and is a promising candidate for high-rate lithium ion energy storage. The fundamental aspects of the lithium insertion mechanism and conduction in TiNb2O7, however, are not well-characterized. Herein, experimental and computational insights are combined to understand the inherent properties of bulk TiNb2O7. The results show an increase in electronic conductivity of seven orders of magnitude upon lithiation and indicate that electrons exhibit both localized and delocalized character, with a maximum Curie constant and Li NMR paramagnetic shift near a composition of Li0.60TiNb2O7. Square-planar or distorted-five-coordinate lithium sites are calculated to invert between thermodynamic minima or transition states. Lithium diffusion in the single-redox region (i.e., x ≤ 3 in LixTiNb2O7) is rapid with low activation barriers from NMR and DLi = 10–11 m2 s–1 at the temperature of the observed T1 minima of 525–650 K for x ≥ 0.75. DFT calculations predict that ionic diffusion, like electronic conduction, is anisotropic with activation barriers for lithium hopping of 100–200 meV down the tunnels but ca. 700–1000 meV across the blocks. Lithium mobility is hindered in the multiredox region (i.e., x > 3 in LixTiNb2O7), related to a transition from interstitial-mediated to vacancy-mediated diffusion. Overall, lithium insertion leads to effective n-type self-doping of TiNb2O7 and high-rate conduction, while ionic motion is eventually hindered at high lithiation. Transition-state searching with beyond Li chemistries (Na+, K+, Mg2+) in TiNb2O7 reveals high diffusion barriers of 1–3 eV, indicating that this structure is specifically suited to Li+ mobility.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jacs.9b06669

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 249

Metadata

Authors
Griffith, K. J., Seymour, I. D., Hope, M. A., Butala, M. M., Lamontagne, L. K., Preefer, M. B., Koçer, C. P., Henkelman, G., Morris, A. J., Cliffe, M. J., Dutton, S. E., & Grey, C. P.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2019-09-05
Volume
141
Issue
42
Pages
16706-16725
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2971823966
Cited by
249
References
3
FWCI
8.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ionic and Electronic Conduction in TiNb2O7. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jacs.9b06669
The paper
Griffith, K. J., Seymour, I. D., Hope, M. A., Butala, M. M., Lamontagne, L. K., Preefer, M. B., Koçer, C. P., Henkelman, G., Morris, A. J., Cliffe, M. J., Dutton, S. E., & Grey, C. P. (2019). Ionic and Electronic Conduction in TiNb2O7. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b06669

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.