Cited by 376Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionCatalytic Processes in Materials ScienceCO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts

Unconventional p–d Hybridization Interaction in PtGa Ultrathin Nanowires Boosts Oxygen Reduction Electrocatalysis

Gao, Lei, Li, Xingxing, Yao, Zhaoyu, Bai, Huijuan, Lu, Yangfan, Ma, Chao, Lu, Shanfu, Peng, Zhenmeng +3 more·2019·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

Alloying 3d transition metals with Pt has been discovered as an effective strategy to boost the catalytic activity in oxygen reduction reaction (ORR), which, however, often raises the insufficient catalyst durability issue due to rapid leaching of the 3d metal elements. To overcome this issue and realize enhancements in both the activity and the durability properties, here we report a new catalytic structure based on PtGa ultrathin alloy nanowires (NWs), which feature an unconventional strong p-d hybridization interaction. Relative to commercial Pt catalyst, the optimum Pt 4.31 Ga NWs catalyst exhibited 10.5- and 12.1-fold enhancement in the ORR mass activity and specific activity, respectively. Particularly, the Pt 4.31 Ga NWs catalyst showed only 15.8% loss in the mass activity after 30 000 cycles of durability test, as compared to a big decrease of 79.6% for the commercial Pt catalyst. Our mechanistic studies find a strong p-d hybridization interaction between Ga and Pt that accounts for the improved ORR performance via synergistically optimizing the surface electronic structure, enhancing the oxidation resistance of Pt, and suppressing the leaching of lattice Ga. We believe this work provides new perspectives to design active and durable electrocatalysts toward ORR.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jacs.9b07238

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gao, L., Li, X., Yao, Z., Bai, H., Lu, Y., Ma, C., Lu, S., Peng, Z., Yang, J., Pan, A., & Huang, H.
Affiliations
  • Hunan University (CN)
  • University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • College of Materials Science and Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha, Hunan 410082, People’s Republic of China
  • Beihang University (CN)
  • State Key Laboratory of Silicon Materials (CN)
  • University of Akron (US)
Corresponding author
  • Peng, Zhenmeng
  • Huang, Hongwen
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2019-10-22
Volume
141
Issue
45
Pages
18083-18090
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2981936780
Cited by
376
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 35
FWCI
7.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Chemical Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China
  • State Key Laboratory of Silicon Materials
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (21688102, 21603208)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
Keywords
oxygen reduction reaction, ultrathin nanowires, p-d hybridization, electrocatalyst durability, surface electronic structure, electrocatalyst design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review