Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 331

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Selective Ethane/Ethylene Separation in a Robust Microporous Hydrogen-Bonded Organic Framework

Open access
Zhang, Xu, Li, Libo, Wang, Jia-Xin, Wen, Hui-Min, Krishna, Rajamani, Wu, Hui, Zhou, Wei, Chen, Zhong-Ning, Li, Bin, Qian, Guodong, Chen, Banglin·2020·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

The separation of ethane (C 2 H 6 ) from ethylene (C 2 H 4 ) is of prime importance in the production of polymer-grade C 2 H 4 for industrial manufacturing. It is very challenging and still remains unexploited to fully realize efficient C 2 H 6 /C 2 H 4 separation in the emerging hydrogen-bonded organic frameworks (HOFs) due to the weak nature of hydrogen bonds. We herein report the benchmark example of a novel ultrarobust HOF adsorbent (termed as HOF-76a) with a Brunauer–Emmett–Teller surface area exceeding 1100 m 2 g –1, exhibiting the preferential binding of C 2 H 6 over C 2 H 4 and thus highly selective separation of C 2 H 6 /C 2 H 4 . Theoretical calculations indicate the key role of the nonpolar surface and the suitable triangular channel-like pores in HOF-76a to sterically “match” better with the nonplanar C 2 H 6 molecule than the planar C 2 H 4, thus affording overall stronger multipoint van der Waals interactions with C 2 H 6 . The exceptional separation performance of HOF-76a for C 2 H 6 /C 2 H 4 separation was clearly demonstrated by gas adsorption isotherms, ideal adsorbed solution theory calculations, and simulated and experimental breakthrough curves. Breakthrough experiments on HOF-76a reveal that polymer-grade ethylene gas can be straightforwardly produced from 50/50 (v/v) C 2 H 6 /C 2 H 4 mixtures during the first adsorption cycle with a high productivity of 7.2 L/kg at 298 K and 1.01 bar and 18.8 L/kg at 298 K and 5.0 bar, respectively.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jacs.9b12428

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 55 references

Cited by

See all 331

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, X., Li, L., Wang, J.-X., Wen, H.-M., Krishna, R., Wu, H., Zhou, W., Chen, Z.-N., Li, B., Qian, G., & Chen, B.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2019-12-14
Volume
142
Issue
1
Pages
633-640
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2995856058
Cited by
331
References
55
FWCI
10.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selective Ethane/Ethylene Separation in a Robust Microporous Hydrogen-Bonded Organic Framework. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jacs.9b12428
The paper
Zhang, X., Li, L., Wang, J.-X., Wen, H.-M., Krishna, R., Wu, H., Zhou, W., Chen, Z.-N., Li, B., Qian, G., & Chen, B. (2020). Selective Ethane/Ethylene Separation in a Robust Microporous Hydrogen-Bonded Organic Framework. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b12428

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.