The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interfacial Tension at Elevated PressuresMeasurements and Correlations in the Water + Carbon Dioxide System
Abstract
A novel apparatus, PeDro, for high-pressure measurement of the interfacial tension using the pendant drop method is presented. This apparatus was constructed for accurate measurements in the two-component system of water and compressed carbon dioxide. The main influences on accurate and reproducible results have been investigated, and the results have led to an optimized experimental setup and a quasi-static measuring method. PeDro was calibrated against well-established data for water + air. The experimental error of measurement is smaller than 2%. In this two-phase system measurements were conducted in the ranges (278 to 335) K and (0.1 to 20) MPa. The interfacial tension showed a pronounced dependence on pressure and temperature. A regression function has been found which describes the experimental data in the range investigated with high precision.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Span, R., & Wagner, W. (1996) · Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data · doi:10.1063/1.555991 · Cited by 5,049
Massoudi, R., & King, A. D. (1974) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/j100615a017 · Cited by 254
Wesch, A., Dahmen, N., Ebert, K. H., et al. (1997) · Chemie Ingenieur Technik · doi:10.1002/cite.330690709 · Cited by 46
Self-citation
Cited by
Carbon capture and storage (CCS): the way forward
Bui, M., Adjiman, C. S., Bardow, A., Anthony, E. J., Boston, A., Brown, S., Fennell, P. S., Fuss, S., Galindo, A., Hackett, L. A., et al. (2018) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c7ee02342a · Cited by 4,374
CO2wettability of seal and reservoir rocks and the implications for carbon geo-sequestration
Iglauer, S., Pentland, C. H., & Busch, A. (2015) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1002/2014wr015553 · Cited by 639
Wettability alteration of caprock minerals by carbon dioxide
CHIQUET, P., BROSETA, D., & THIBEAU, S. (2007) · Geofluids · doi:10.1111/j.1468-8123.2007.00168.x · Cited by 498
CO2/water interfacial tensions under pressure and temperature conditions of CO2 geological storage
Chiquet, P., Daridon, J.-L., Broseta, D., & Thibeau, S. (2007) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2006.09.011 · Cited by 462
Comprehensive Review of Caprock-Sealing Mechanisms for Geologic Carbon Sequestration
Song, J., & Zhang, D. (2013) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es301610p · Cited by 388
Metadata
- Authors
- Hebach, A., Oberhof, A., Dahmen, N., Kögel, A., Ederer, H., & Dinjus, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-10-18
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1540-1546
- ISSN
- 0021-9568 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5134
- OpenAlex
- W2086329353
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
