Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 333

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Volatility of Aprotic Ionic Liquids — A Review

M. S. S. Esperança, José, Canongia Lopes, José N., Tariq, Mohd, Santos, Luís M. N. B. F., Magee, Joseph W., Rebelo, Luís Paulo N.·2010·Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data

Abstract

Research on the volatility of aprotic ionic liquids is reviewed. This topic is limited to aprotic liquids since measurements have led to a generalization that this class of substances possesses extremely low vapor pressures. For research related to this topic, the period covered is 2003 to 2008. The review begins with a discussion of the earliest successful study of thermal vaporization of aprotic ionic liquids, the earliest indirect measurements of their vapor pressure, the first proof of conventional distillation of ionic liquids, and competition of vaporization with thermal decomposition seen at moderately high temperatures of (200 to 300) °C. The review then briefly discusses the nature of the vapor phase and proceeds to analyze the various approaches used to measure or predict the vapor−liquid equilibrium properties of ionic liquids, including their normal boiling point, vapor pressure, and enthalpy of vaporization. It is proposed that the most reliable thermodynamic data exist solely for the enthalpy of vaporization, and thus this property would be the best target for predictive approaches. Predictive approaches to calculate the enthalpy of vaporization are discussed in light of their ability to predict the experimentally observed trends with molar mass. The review concludes with a forward look at the following: expected effect of gas-phase ion clusters; anticipated trade-off between the energetic gain and the entropic penalty for cluster formation; and the possibility of a Trouton rule for the vaporization of ionic liquids.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/je900458w

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 333

Metadata

Authors
M. S. S. Esperança, J., Canongia Lopes, J. N., Tariq, M., Santos, L. M. N. B. F., Magee, J. W., & Rebelo, L. P. N.
Venue
Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data
Published
2009-08-07
Volume
55
Issue
1
Pages
3-12
ISSN
  • 0021-9568 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5134
OpenAlex
W2070094805
Cited by
333
References
1
FWCI
11.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Volatility of Aprotic Ionic Liquids — A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/je900458w
The paper
M. S. S. Esperança, J., Canongia Lopes, J. N., Tariq, M., Santos, L. M. N. B. F., Magee, J. W., & Rebelo, L. P. N. (2010). Volatility of Aprotic Ionic Liquids — A Review. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. https://doi.org/10.1021/je900458w

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.