Cited by 108Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis ResearchProteins in Food SystemsProtein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides

Immunochemical and structural analysis of pepsin-digested egg white ovomucoid

Kovacs-Nolan, Jennifer, Zhang, Jie Wei, Hayakawa, Shigeru, Mine, Yoshinori·2000·Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Abstract

Ovomucoid, an egg protein comprising approximately 10% egg white, was digested using the enzyme pepsin, and fragments were isolated by anion-exchange and reverse phase HPLC. Four distinct fragments were identified by analysis with SDS-PAGE, including three large fragments with molecular weights of around 24, 18, and 14 kDa. N- and C-terminal and amino acid sequencing analyses identified the fragments as V134-C186 (domain 3), V21-A133, and A1-A133 (domain 1+2). Further separation and sequencing of the fraction composed of small peptides, to determine their exact makeup and location in the protein, remained to be carried out and identified a peptide G51-Y73. All four fragments showed IgE-binding activity, as measured by ELISA, using human sera from egg-allergic individuals. Little change in the digestibility of ovomucoid by trypsin and chymotrypsin was observed following digestion with pepsin, indicating that pepsin-digested ovomucoid retains its trypsin (protease) inhibitor activities. Reduced carboxymethylated ovomucoid was prepared, and digestion with pepsin produced significantly more peptides than did the digestion of the native ovomucoid, indicating that the disulfide bonds play a significant role in the digestive resistance of ovomucoid. The reduction of ovomucoid enhanced its digestibility and lower allergenicity of the protein.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jf000358e

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kovacs-Nolan, J., Zhang, J. W., Hayakawa, S., & Mine, Y.
Affiliations
Kagawa University (JP)
Corresponding author
Mine, Yoshinori
Venue
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Published
2000-10-21
Volume
48
Issue
12
Pages
6261-6266
ISSN
  • 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5118
OpenAlex
W2091756386
Cited by
108
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Proteins in Food Systems
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides
Keywords
ovomucoid, egg white proteins, pepsin digestion, protein fragments, IgE binding, egg allergy, trypsin inhibitor activity, chymotrypsin, disulfide bonds, allergenicity, peptide mapping
MeSH terms
Digestion, Egg White, Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Immunochemistry, Molecular Sequence Data, Ovomucin, Pepsin A, Peptide Fragments, Molecular Structure, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review