The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Acute, Sublethal, Antifeedant, and Synergistic Effects of Monoterpenoid Essential Oil Compounds on the Tobacco Cutworm, Spodoptera litura (Lep., Noctuidae)
Abstract
Monoterpenoids (terpenes and biogenically related phenols) commonly found in plant essential oils were tested for acute toxicity via topical application to tobacco cutworms (Spodoptera litura Fab.). The most toxic among 10 such compounds was thymol (LD(50) = 25.4 microg/larva) from garden thyme, Thymus vulgaris. The compounds were then tested for sublethal effects, specifically inhibition of larval growth after topical application of low doses. Among 6 compounds tested, an LD(10) dose reduced growth by 20% on average 3 days after administration. Feeding deterrence was determined using a cabbage leaf disk choice test. The most deterrent compound was thymol, with a DC(50) of 85.6 microg/cm(2) leaf disk area. Because minor constituents in complex essential oils have been suggested to act as synergists, binary mixtures of the compounds were tested for synergy vis à vis acute toxicity and feeding deterrence. trans-Anethole acted synergistically with thymol, citronellal, and alpha-terpineol, in terms of both acute toxicity and feeding deterrence. On the basis of these findings, several complex mixtures were developed and tested as leads for effective control agents. Candidate mixtures demonstrated good synergistic effects. The observed LD(50) of mixture 3 was 40.6 microg/larvae compared to an expected value of 74.6 microg/larvae. The result of this research is a proprietary product suitable for commercial production.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Selection for resistance to azadirachtin in the green peach aphid,Myzus persicae
Feng, R., & Isman, M. B. (1995) · Experientia · doi:10.1007/bf01922438 · Cited by 249
Self-citation
Cited by
Essential oils for the development of eco-friendly mosquito larvicides: A review
Pavela, R. (2015) · Industrial Crops and Products · doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.06.050 · Cited by 788
Activity and mechanisms of action of selected biocidal agents on Gram-positive and-negative bacteria
Walsh, S. E., Maillard, J.-Y., Russell, A. D., Catrenich, C. E., Charbonneau, D. L., & Bartolo, R. G. (2003) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.01825.x · Cited by 527
Green Pesticides: Essential Oils as Biopesticides in Insect-pest Management
Mossa, A.-T. H. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.3923/jest.2016.354.378 · Cited by 454
Chapter 2 Pesticides based on plant essential oils: from traditional practice to commercialization
Isman, M. B., & Machial, C. M. (2006) · Advances in Phytomedicine · doi:10.1016/s1572-557x(06)03002-9 · Cited by 287
Self-citationComparing impacts of plant extracts and pure allelochemicals and implications for pest control.
Opender Koul, O. K., & Suresh Walia, S. W. (2009) · CABI Reviews · doi:10.1079/pavsnnr20094049 · Cited by 151
Metadata
- Authors
- Hummelbrunner, L. A., & Isman, M. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2001-01-17
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 715-720
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W1986853288
- Cited by
- 552
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Acute, Sublethal, Antifeedant, and Synergistic Effects of Monoterpenoid Essential Oil Compounds on the Tobacco Cutworm, Spodoptera litura (Lep., Noctuidae). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jf000749t
- The paper
- Hummelbrunner, L. A., & Isman, M. B. (2001). Acute, Sublethal, Antifeedant, and Synergistic Effects of Monoterpenoid Essential Oil Compounds on the Tobacco Cutworm, Spodoptera litura (Lep., Noctuidae). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf000749t
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.