The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Separation, Identification, Quantification, and Method Validation of Anthocyanins in Botanical Supplement Raw Materials by HPLC and HPLC−MS
Abstract
A method has been established and validated for identification and quantification of individual, as well as total, anthocyanins by HPLC and LC/ES-MS in botanical raw materials used in the herbal supplement industry. The anthocyanins were separated and identified on the basis of their respective M(+) (cation) using LC/ES-MS. Separated anthocyanins were individually calculated against one commercially available anthocyanin external standard (cyanidin-3-glucoside chloride) and expressed as its equivalents. Amounts of each anthocyanin calculated as external standard equivalent were then multiplied by a molecular-weight correction factor to afford their specific quantities. Experimental procedures and use of a molecular-weight correction factors are substantiated and validated using Balaton tart cherry and elderberry as templates. Cyanidin-3-glucoside chloride has been widely used in the botanical industry to calculate total anthocyanins. In our studies on tart cherry and elderberry, its use as external standard followed by use of molecular-weight correction factors should provide relatively accurate results for total anthocyanins, because of the presence of cyanidin as their major anthocyanidin backbone. The method proposed here is simple and has a direct sample preparation procedure without any solid-phase extraction. It enables selection and use of commercially available anthocyanins as external standards for quantification of specific anthocyanins in the sample matrix irrespective of their commercial availability as analytical standards. It can be used as a template and applied for similar quantification in several anthocyanin-containing raw materials for routine quality control procedures, thus providing consistency in analytical testing of botanical raw materials used for manufacturing efficacious and true-to-the-label nutritional supplements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kammerer, D., Claus, A., Carle, R., & Schieber, A. (2004) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf049613b · Cited by 621
Sweet and Sour Cherry Phenolics and Their Protective Effects on Neuronal Cells
Kim, D.-O., Heo, H. J., Kim, Y. J., Yang, H. S., & Lee, C. Y. (2005) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf0518599 · Cited by 377
Cherry Antioxidants: From Farm to Table
Ferretti, G., Bacchetti, T., Belleggia, A., & Neri, D. (2010) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules15106993 · Cited by 320
Berry anthocyanins: isolation, identification and antioxidant activities
Kähkönen, M. P., Heinämäki, J., Ollilainen, V., & Heinonen, M. (2003) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.1511 · Cited by 320
Wittenauer, J., Falk, S., Schweiggert-Weisz, U., & Carle, R. (2012) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.02.094 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Chandra, A., Rana, J., & Li, Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2001-06-21
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3515-3521
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W1994671748
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Separation, Identification, Quantification, and Method Validation of Anthocyanins in Botanical Supplement Raw Materials by HPLC and HPLC−MS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jf010389p
- The paper
- Chandra, A., Rana, J., & Li, Y. (2001). Separation, Identification, Quantification, and Method Validation of Anthocyanins in Botanical Supplement Raw Materials by HPLC and HPLC−MS. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf010389p
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.