The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Glycoalkaloid and Calystegine Contents of Eight Potato Cultivars
Abstract
Diverse procedures have been reported for the separation and analysis by HPLC of the two major glycoalkaloids present in potatoes, alpha-chaconine and alpha-solanine. To further improve the usefulness of the HPLC method, studies were carried out on the influence of several salient parameters on the analysis of the two potato glycoalkaloids. Effects on retention (elution, separation) times of the (a) composition and pH of the mobile phase (acetonitrile and phosphate buffer), (b) concentration of the phosphate buffer, (c) capacity values of column packing of four commercial HPLC amino columns, (d) column temperature were studied. Except for pH, all of the variables significantly influenced the retention times. The results make it possible to select analysis conditions that produce well-separated as well as symmetrical peaks of the two glycoalkaloids. This improved HPLC method (limit of detection of approximately 150 ng) was evaluated with extracts from the cortex of one whole potato variety (May Queen) grown in Japan and the freeze-dried peel and flesh from the following eight cultivars grown in the United States: Atlantic, Dark Red Norland, Ranger Russet, Red Lasoda, Russet Burbank, Russet Norkota, Shepody, and Snowden. In addition, the same samples were analyzed by GC-MS for the presence of two water-soluble nortropane alkaloids, calystegine A(3) and calystegine B(2), reported to be potent glycosidase inhibitors. The following ranges for the eight varieties of total glycoalkaloid and calystegine levels were observed: dry flesh, 5-592 and 6-316 mg/kg; dry peel, 84-2226 and 218-2581 mg/kg; dry whole potatoes, 40-883 and 34-326 mg/kg; wet flesh, 1-148 and 1-68 mg/kg; wet peel, 12-429 and 35-467 mg/kg; wet whole potatoes, 7-187 and 5-68 mg/kg. The possible significance of the results to plant and food sciences is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Polyhydroxylated alkaloids—Natural occurrence and therapeutic applications
Watson, A. A., Fleet, G. W. J., Asano, N., Molyneux, R. J., & Nash, R. J. (2001) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0031-9422(00)00451-9 · Cited by 714
Cited by
Review of Methods for the Reduction of Dietary Content and Toxicity of Acrylamide
Friedman, M., & Levin, C. E. (2008) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf0730486 · Cited by 271
Self-citationPotato peels as sources of functional compounds for the food industry: A review
Sampaio, S. L., Petropoulos, S. A., Alexopoulos, A., Heleno, S. A., Santos-Buelga, C., Barros, L., & Ferreira, I. C. F. R. (2020) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2020.07.015 · Cited by 165
Potato peels: A source of nutritionally and pharmacologically interesting compounds - A review
Schieber, A., & Saldaña, M. D. A. (2009) · University of Alberta Library · doi:10.7939/r33t9dm0h · Cited by 147
Pattnaik, M., Pandey, P., Martin, G. J. O., Mishra, H. N., & Ashokkumar, M. (2021) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods10020279 · Cited by 146
Sánchez Maldonado, A. F., Mudge, E., Gänzle, M. G., & Schieber, A. (2014) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2014.06.018 · Cited by 110
Petersson, E. V., Arif, U., Schulzova, V., Krtková, V., Hajšlová, J., Meijer, J., Andersson, H. C., Jonsson, L., & Sitbon, F. (2013) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf400318p · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Friedman, M., Roitman, J. N., & Kozukue, N.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-04-10
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2964-2973
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W1974601949
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.