The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Metabolic Profiling of Root Exudates of Arabidopsisthaliana
Abstract
This paper was withdrawn on October 7, 2009 ( J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 9346). In addition to accumulating biologically active chemicals, plant roots continuously produce and secrete compounds into their immediate rhizosphere. However, the mechanisms that drive and regulate root secretion of secondary metabolites are not fully understood. To enlighten two neglected areas of root biology, root secretion and secondary metabolism, an in vitro system implementing root-specific elicitation over a 48-day time course was developed. After roots of Arabidopsis thaliana had been elicited with salicylic acid, jasmonic acid, chitosan, and two fungal cell wall elicitors, the secondary metabolites subsequently secreted were profiled. High-performance liquid chromatography was used to metabolically profile compounds in the root exudates, and 289 possible secondary metabolites were quantified. The chemical structures of 10 compounds were further characterized by 1 H and 13 C NMR: butanoic acid, trans -cinnamic acid, o -coumaric acid, p -coumaric acid, ferulic acid, p -hydroxybenzamide, methyl p -hydroxybenzoate, 3-indolepropanoic acid, syringic acid, and vanillic acid. Several of these compounds exhibited a wide range of antimicrobial activity against both soil-borne bacteria and fungi at the concentration detected in the root exudates. Keywords: Arabidopsis thaliana; Brassicaceae; butanoic acid; trans -cinnamic acid; o -coumaric acid; p -coumaric acid; ferulic acid; p -hydroxybenzamide; methyl p -hydroxybenzoate; 3-indolepropanoic acid; syringic acid; vanillic acid; elicitation
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Two Classes of Plant Antibiotics: Phytoalexins versus "Phytoanticipins"
VanEtten, H. D., Mansfield, J. W., Bailey, J. A., & Farmer, E. E. (1994) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.6.9.1191 · Cited by 710
Cited by
Plant and mycorrhizal regulation of rhizodeposition
Jones, D. L., Hodge, A., & Kuzyakov, Y. (2004) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01130.x · Cited by 1,371
How plants communicate using the underground information superhighway
Bais, H. P., Park, S.-W., Weir, T. L., Callaway, R. M., & Vivanco, J. M. (2004) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2003.11.008 · Cited by 889
Self-citationDoornbos, R. F., van Loon, L. C., & Bakker, P. A. H. M. (2012) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-011-0028-y · Cited by 706
Secondary metabolites in fungus-plant interactions
Pusztahelyi, T., Holb, I. J., & Pócsi, I. (2015) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2015.00573 · Cited by 583
Micallef, S. A., Shiaris, M. P., & Colón-Carmona, A. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erp053 · Cited by 526
Metadata
- Authors
- Walker, T. S., Bais, H. P., Halligan, K. M., Stermitz, F. R., & Vivanco, J. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-03-20
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2548-2554
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W2092394921
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Status
- Retracted
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metabolic Profiling of Root Exudates of Arabidopsisthaliana. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jf021166h
- The paper
- Walker, T. S., Bais, H. P., Halligan, K. M., Stermitz, F. R., & Vivanco, J. M. (2003). Metabolic Profiling of Root Exudates of Arabidopsisthaliana. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf021166h
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
