The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Influence of Arabidopsis thaliana accessions on rhizobacterial communities and natural variation in root exudates
Open accessAbstract
Plant species is considered to be one of the most important factors in shaping rhizobacterial communities, but specific plant-microbe interactions in the rhizosphere are still not fully understood. Arabidopsis thaliana, for which a large number of naturally occurring ecotype accessions exist, lacks mycorrhizal associations and is hence an ideal model for rhizobacterial studies. Eight Arabidopsis accessions were found to exert a marked selective influence on bacteria associated with their roots, as determined by terminal-restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) and ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (RISA). Community differences in species composition and relative abundance were both significant (P <0.001). The eight distinct and reproducible accession-dependent community profiles also differed from control bulk soil. Root exudates of these variants were analysed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) to try to establish whether the unique rhizobacterial assemblages among accessions could be attributed to plant-regulated chemical changes in the rhizosphere. Natural variation in root exudation patterns was clearly exhibited, suggesting that differences in exudation patterns among accessions could be influencing bacterial assemblages. Other factors such as root system architecture are also probably involved. Finally, to investigate the Arabidopsis rhizosphere further, the phylogenetic diversity of rhizobacteria from accession Cvi-0 is described.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
2 retracted
Mediation of pathogen resistance by exudation of antimicrobials from roots
Bais, H. P., Prithiviraj, B., Jha, A. K., Ausubel, F. M., & Vivanco, J. M. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03356 · Cited by 169
RetractedMetabolic Profiling of Root Exudates of Arabidopsisthaliana
Walker, T. S., Bais, H. P., Halligan, K. M., Stermitz, F. R., & Vivanco, J. M. (2003) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf021166h · Cited by 165
RetractedTOWARD AN ECOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION OF SOIL BACTERIA
Fierer, N., Bradford, M. A., & Jackson, R. B. (2007) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/05-1839 · Cited by 5,079
Edwards, U., Rogall, T., Blöcker, H., Emde, M., & Böttger, E. C. (1989) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/17.19.7843 · Cited by 2,724
Living in a fungal world: impact of fungi on soil bacterial niche development
Boer, W. D., Folman, L. B., Summerbell, R. C., & Boddy, L. (2005) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.femsre.2004.11.005 · Cited by 1,867
Smalla, K., Wieland, G., Buchner, A., Zock, A., Parzy, J., Kaiser, S., Roskot, N., Heuer, H., & Berg, G. (2001) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.67.10.4742-4751.2001 · Cited by 1,185
Selective influence of plant species on microbial diversity in the rhizosphere
Grayston, S. J., Wang, S., Campbell, C. D., & Edwards, A. C. (1998) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0038-0717(97)00124-7 · Cited by 1,171
Microbial co-operation in the rhizosphere
Barea, J.-M., Pozo, M. J., Azcón, R., & Azcón-Aguilar, C. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/eri197 · Cited by 1,154
Root-Secreted Malic Acid Recruits Beneficial Soil Bacteria
Rudrappa, T., Czymmek, K. J., Paré, P. W., & Bais, H. P. (2008) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.108.127613 · Cited by 1,149
Bever, J. D. (2003) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00714.x · Cited by 873
Cited by
The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health
Berendsen, R. L., Pieterse, C. M. J., & Bakker, P. A. H. M. (2012) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2012.04.001 · Cited by 5,347
Structure and functions of the bacterial microbiota of plants
Bulgarelli, D., Schlaeppi, K., Spaepen, S., van Themaat, E. V. L., & Schulze-Lefert, P. (2013) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120106 · Cited by 3,308
Backer, R., Rokem, J. S., Ilangumaran, G., Lamont, J., Praslickova, D., Ricci, E., Subramanian, S., & Smith, D. L. (2018) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.01473 · Cited by 2,114
Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and root system functioning
Vacheron, J., Desbrosses, G., Bouffaud, M.-L., Touraine, B., Moënne-Loccoz, Y., Muller, D., Legendre, L., Wisniewski-Dyé, F., & Prigent-Combaret, C. (2013) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2013.00356 · Cited by 1,524
Turner, T. R., James, E. K., & Poole, P. S. (2013) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2013-14-6-209 · Cited by 1,349
Metadata
- Authors
- Micallef, S. A., Shiaris, M. P., & Colón-Carmona, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1729-1742
- ISSN
- 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2431
- OpenAlex
- W2015046427
- Cited by
- 526
- References
- 61
- FWCI
- 16.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influence of Arabidopsis thaliana accessions on rhizobacterial communities and natural variation in root exudates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jxb/erp053
- The paper
- Micallef, S. A., Shiaris, M. P., & Colón-Carmona, A. (2009). Influence of Arabidopsis thaliana accessions on rhizobacterial communities and natural variation in root exudates. Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erp053
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
