The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In Vitro Gastrointestinal Digestion Study of Broccoli Inflorescence Phenolic Compounds, Glucosinolates, and Vitamin C
Abstract
Broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var. italica cv. Marathon) inflorescences are a good source of bioactive compounds, such as phenolics (flavonoids and hydroxycinnamoyl derivatives), glucosinolates, and vitamin C. In this work, these health-promoting compounds were submitted to digestion under in vitro gastrointestinal conditions (pH, temperature, enzyme, and chemical conditions). This technique differentiated among the compounds associated with macromolecules in soluble and insoluble form and those that are freely soluble. In addition, it evaluates the chemical stability of the broccoli compounds under simulated physiological conditions. The gastric digestion of broccoli caused high losses in glucosinolates (69% loss), whereas phenolics and vitamin C presented higher stability under these conditions. Thus, there were no losses in flavonoids, a 7% loss of vitamin C, and a variable rate of loss (6-25%) in hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives. The stability of all of the compounds was affected by the in vitro intestinal conditions. Under the in vitro conditions, flavonoids and hydroxycinnamoyl acid derivatives were of low availability, due to their significant losses under these conditions, at the end of the experiment (84 and 80% loss, respectively). Vitamin C was the metabolite that showed the greater decrease after intestinal digestion (91% loss). Regarding the remaining glucosinolates, these compounds presented higher stability under intestinal conditions, rendering an availability similar to that found for phenolics (75% loss). Therefore, broccoli components were affected by gastric and/or intestinal conditions depending on the type of compound. Thus, glucosinolates were mainly degraded by gastric conditions, whereas phenolic compounds and vitamin C were degraded by intestinal conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chlorogenic Acid and Caffeic Acid Are Absorbed in Humans
Olthof, M. R., Katan, M. B., & Hollman, P. C. H. (2001) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/131.1.66 · Cited by 975
Cited by
Etcheverry, P., Grusak, M. A., & Fleige, L. E. (2012) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2012.00317 · Cited by 391
Filannino, P., Bai, Y., Di Cagno, R., Gobbetti, M., & Gänzle, M. G. (2015) · Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.fm.2014.08.018 · Cited by 354
Insights on the Health Benefits of the Bioactive Compounds of Coffee Silverskin Extract
Fernandez-Gomez, B., Lezama, A., Amigo-Benavent, M., Ullate, M., Herrero, M., Martín, M. Á., Mesa, M. D., & del Castillo, M. D. (2016) · Journal of Functional Foods · doi:10.1016/j.jff.2016.06.001 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Vallejo, F., Gil-Izquierdo, A., Pérez-Vicente, A., & García-Viguera, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-12-16
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 135-138
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W2081293633
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.