The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identification and Characterization of Anthocyanins by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography−Electrospray Ionization−Tandem Mass Spectrometry in Common Foods in the United States: Vegetables, Nuts, and Grains
Abstract
Anthocyanins in common foods in the United States, other than fruits and berries, were identified and characterized by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry coupled with diode array detection. Of all of the 40+ vegetables, nuts, and grains screened, seven vegetables, one nut, and one grain were found to contain anthocyanins; the number of anthocyanins detected varied from two in pistachio nuts to 34 in red radishes. The individual anthocyanins were identified by comparing their mass spectrometric data and retention times with those of standards, published data, and reference food samples. In all of the samples analyzed, except for sorghum, only six common anthocyanidins (delphinidin, cyanidin, pelargonidin, petunidin, peonidin, and malvidin) were found as their glycosides. Anthocyanins in certain vegetables such as red cabbage and red radish were highly conjugated with sugars and acylated groups, and thus, their structures were very complicated. Eight different either aliphatic or aromatic acylated groups (acetoyl, coumaroyl, malonoyl, p-hydroxybenzoyl, feruoyl, caffeoyl, sinapoyl, and oxaloyl) were identified in the anthocyanins. In addition to glucose, six other sugar moieties (galactose, xylose, rhamnose, rutinose, sambubiose, and laminaribiose) were observed. Three varieties of sorghum were found to contain 3-deoxyanthocyanidins and their derivatives as major anthocyanins. A number of new anthocyanins were identified in the foods studied. This paper presents complete HPLC profiles and MS spectrometric data, obtained under the same experimental conditions, for common vegetables, pistachio nuts, and sorghum that contain anthocyanins.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sorghum phytochemicals and their potential impact on human health
Awika, J. M., & Rooney, L. W. (2004) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.phytochem.2004.04.001 · Cited by 966
Cited by
Review of methods to determine antioxidant capacities
Karadag, A., Ozcelik, B., & Saner, S. (2009) · Food Analytical Methods · doi:10.1007/s12161-008-9067-7 · Cited by 753
Phenolic-Compound-Extraction Systems for Fruit and Vegetable Samples
Garcia-Salas, P., Morales-Soto, A., Segura-Carretero, A., & Fernández-Gutiérrez, A. (2010) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules15128813 · Cited by 623
Onions: A Source of Unique Dietary Flavonoids
Slimestad, R., Fossen, T., & Vågen, I. M. (2007) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf0712503 · Cited by 624
Xiong, Y., Zhang, P., Warner, R. D., & Fang, Z. (2019) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12506 · Cited by 336
Ngamwonglumlert, L., Devahastin, S., & Chiewchan, N. (2017) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2015.1109498 · Cited by 297
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, X., & Prior, R. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-03-26
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3101-3113
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W2017520661
- Cited by
- 495
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.