Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 209

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Why Do Gelatinized Starch Granules Not Dissolve Completely? Roles for Amylose, Protein, and Lipid in Granule “Ghost” Integrity

Debet, Martine R., Gidley, Michael J.·2007·Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Abstract

After gelatinization in water, starch granules persist in swollen hydrated forms known as ghosts. Three potential mechanisms for ghost formation are tested. Proteins and lipids on the granule surface are found to be a determinant of ghost robustness, but not ghost formation. Proteins inside pre-made maize or wheat starch ghosts are degraded extensively by proteases without any apparent change in ghost properties, making an internal protein cross-linking mechanism unlikely. Waxy maize mutants with a range of amylose contents have ghost integrities that correlate with (low) apparent amylose levels. It is hypothesized that ghost formation is due to cross-linking of polysaccharide chains within swollen granules, most likely involving double helices formed from polymer chains that become free to move following heat-induced granule swelling. The size and robustness of granule ghosts is proposed to be determined by the relative rates of swelling and cross-linking, modulated by surface non-polysaccharide components.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jf070004o

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Debet, M. R., & Gidley, M. J.
Venue
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Published
2007-05-16
Volume
55
Issue
12
Pages
4752-4760
ISSN
  • 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5118
OpenAlex
W1965562167
Cited by
209
References
0
FWCI
4.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.