The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular disassembly of starch granules during gelatinization and its effect on starch digestibility: a review
Abstract
Starch is the most important glycemic carbohydrate in foods. The relationship between the rate and extent of starch digestion to produce glucose for absorption into the bloodstream and risk factors for diet-related diseases is of considerable nutritional interest. Native starch is attacked slowly by enzymes, but after hydrothermal processing its susceptibility to enzymatic breakdown is greatly increased. Most starch consumed by humans has undergone some form of processing or cooking, which causes native starch granules to gelatinize, followed by retrogradation on cooling. The extent of gelatinization and retrogradation are major determinants of the susceptibility of starch to enzymatic digestion and its functional properties for food processing. The type and extent of changes that occur in starch as a result of gelatinization, pasting and retrogradation are determined by the type of the starch, processing and storage conditions. A mechanistic understanding of the molecular disassembly of starch granules during gelatinization is critical to explaining the effects of processing or cooking on starch digestibility. This review focuses on the molecular disassembly of starch granules during starch gelatinization over a wide range of water levels, and its consequential effect on in vitro starch digestibility and in vivo glycemic index.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The roles of amylose and amylopectin in the gelation and retrogradation of starch
Miles, M. J., Morris, V. J., Orford, P. D., & Ring, S. G. (1985) · Carbohydrate Research · doi:10.1016/s0008-6215(00)90778-x · Cited by 1,202
Review: Starch Matrices and the Glycemic Response
Parada, J., & Aguilera, J. M. (2011) · Food Science and Technology International · doi:10.1177/1082013210387712 · Cited by 110
Cited by
Update of the concept of type 5 resistant starch (RS5): Self-assembled starch V-type complexes
Gutiérrez, T. J., & Tovar, J. (2021) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2021.01.078 · Cited by 325
Applications of ionic liquids in starch chemistry: a review
Ren, F., Wang, J., Xie, F., Zan, K., Wang, S., & Wang, S. (2020) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c9gc03738a · Cited by 166
Self-citationQazi, H. J., Ye, A., Acevedo-Fani, A., & Singh, H. (2025) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2024.2353366 · Cited by 54
“Starch is composed of two types of molecule: linear glucose polymer (amylose) and branched polymer (amylopectin) (Singh, Dartois, and Kaur 2010; Wang and Copeland 2013).”
Hardy, K., Buckley, S., & Copeland, L. (2018) · Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews · doi:10.1002/evan.21718 · Cited by 35
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, S., & Copeland, L.
- Venue
- Food & Function
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1564
- ISSN
- 2042-6496 (ISSN-L)
- 2042-650X
- OpenAlex
- W2080082555
- Cited by
- 685
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular disassembly of starch granules during gelatinization and its effect on starch digestibility: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c3fo60258c
- The paper
- Wang, S., & Copeland, L. (2013). Molecular disassembly of starch granules during gelatinization and its effect on starch digestibility: a review. Food & Function. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3fo60258c
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.