The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Protein–Protein Interactions during High-Moisture Extrusion for Fibrous Meat Analogues and Comparison of Protein Solubility Methods Using Different Solvent Systems
Abstract
Soy protein, mixed with gluten and starch, was extruded into fibrous meat analogues under high-moisture and high-temperature conditions. The protein solubility of samples collected at different extruder zones and extrudates made with different moistures was determined by 11 extraction solutions consisting of 6 selective reagents and their combinations: phosphate salts, urea, DTT, thiourea, Triton X-100, and CHAPS. Protein solubility by most extractants showed decreasing patterns as the material passed through the extruder, but the solution containing all 6 reagents, known as isoelectric focus (IEF) buffer, solubilized the highest levels and equal amounts of proteins in all samples, indicating that there are no other covalent bonds involved besides disulfide bonds. With regard to relative importance between disulfide bonds and non-covalent interactions, different conclusions could be made from protein solubility patterns, depending on the type of extracting systems and a baseline used for comparison. The observation points out pitfalls and limitation of current protein solubility methodology and explains why controversy exists in the literature. Using the IEF buffer system with omission of one or more selective reagents is considered to be the right methodology to conduct protein solubility study and thus recommended. Results obtained with this system indicate that disulfide bonding plays a more important role than non-covalent bonds in not only holding the rigid structure of extrudates but also forming fibrous texture. The sharpest decrease in protein solubility occurred when the mix passed through the intermediate section of the extruder barrel, indicating formation of new disulfide bonds during the stage of dramatic increase in both temperature and moisture. After this stage, although the physical form of the product might undergo change and fiber formation might occur as it passed through the cooling die, the chemical nature of the product did not change significantly.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Structuring processes for meat analogues
Dekkers, B. L., Boom, R. M., & van der Goot, A. J. (2018) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2018.08.011 · Cited by 751
Ge, J., Sun, C., Corke, H., Gul, K., Gan, R., & Fang, Y. (2020) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12573 · Cited by 318
Modulating Molecular Interactions in Pea Protein to Improve Its Functional Properties
Shen, Y., Du, Z., Wu, X., & Li, Y. (2022) · Journal of Agriculture and Food Research · doi:10.1016/j.jafr.2022.100313 · Cited by 50
Chiang, J. H., Hardacre, A. K., & Parker, M. E. (2020) · Journal of Food Science · doi:10.1111/1750-3841.14960 · Cited by 44
Tan, Z., Yang, X., Zhao, W., Ma, J., Fan, X., Liu, Z., & Dong, X. (2025) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2025.143365 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, K., & Hsieh, F.-H.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-03-18
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2681-2687
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W1980192669
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.