Characterization of Microalgal Carotenoids by Mass Spectrometry and Their Bioavailability and Antioxidant Properties Elucidated in Rat Model
Abstract
Of the total carotenoids in respective algal samples, beta-carotene in Spirulina platensis was 69.5%, astaxanthin and its esters in Haematococcus pluvialis was 81.38%, and lutein in Botryococcus braunii was 74.6%. The carotenoids were characterized by mass spectrometry. A time-course study of carotenoids in rats after administration of microalgal biomass showed peak levels in plasma, liver, and eyes at 2, 4, and 6 h, respectively. Beta-carotene accumulation in Spirulina-fed rats was maximum in eye tissues at 6 h. Similarly, levels of astaxanthin and lutein in Haematococcus- and Botryococcus-fed rats were also maximal in eye tissues. Astaxanthin from H. pluvialis showed better bioavailability than beta-carotene and lutein. The antioxidant enzymes, catalase, superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, and TBARS were significantly high in plasma at 2 h and in liver at 4 h, evidently offering protection from free radicals. This study implies that microalgae can be a good source of carotenoids of high bioavailability and nutraceutical value.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Spirulina has high nutritional value due to its content in proteins, essential amino acids, minerals, essential fatty acids, vitamins, and liposoluble antioxidants.
“Spirulina has high nutritional values due to its content in proteins, essential amino acids, minerals, essential fatty acids, vitamins, and liposoluble antioxidants (vitamin E and carotenoids) [28–38]”
From Antioxidant, Immunomodulating, and Microbial‐Modulating Activities of the Sustainable and Ecofriendly <i>Spirulina</i> (2017) · cites this paper as [37]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 215
- Authors
- Ranga Rao, A., Raghunath Reddy, R. L., Baskaran, V., Sarada, R., & Ravishankar, G. A.
- Affiliations
- Plant Cell Biotechnology Department
- Biochemistry & Nutrition Department
- Corresponding author
- Ravishankar, G. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-07-13
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 8553-8559
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W2079899391
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 10.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Seaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
- Keywords
- beta-carotene, astaxanthin, lutein, Spirulina platensis, Haematococcus pluvialis, Botryococcus braunii, carotenoid bioavailability, antioxidant enzymes, lipid peroxidation, nutraceuticals, rat model
- MeSH terms
- Chlorophyta, Animals, Antioxidants, Biological Availability, Carotenoids, Male, Mass Spectrometry, Tissue Distribution, Rats, Wistar, Rats, Spirulina
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review