The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cultivar Evaluation and Effect of Fermentation on Antioxidant Capacity and in Vitro Inhibition of α-Amylase and α-Glucosidase by Highbush Blueberry (Vaccinium corombosum)
Abstract
The berry fruits of highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum) contain bioactive compounds with potential health benefits. The objective was to evaluate blueberries grown in southern Illinois as well as the effect of fermentation, at two different temperatures, on chemical and physical parameters. Fruits from fifteen blueberry cultivars were analyzed. Fruit diameter ranged from 12.8 mm to 18.7 mm, pH from 2.6 to 3.7, reducing sugars from 6.4% to 15.2%, total sugars from 13.9% to 21.6%, total polyphenols from 0.39 to 1.00 mg gallic acid equivalents (GAE)/g blueberry and antioxidant capacity from 5.8 to 10.9 μM Trolox equivalents (TE)/g. In vitro α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibitory capacity relative to the positive control acarbose, a known anti-diabetic drug, showed a range from 91.8 to 103.3% for α-amylase and from 103.2% to 190.8% for α-glucosidase. Wines prepared from several of these blueberry cultivars were analyzed throughout fermentation and compared at room temperature and cold temperature fermentation for pH (3.5 to 6.3), °Brix (13.6 to 29.7), total polyphenols (375.4 to 657.1 μg GAE/mL wine), and antioxidant capacity (4.5 to 25.1 mM TE). The wines were also tested for their in vitro capacity to inhibit α-amylase and α-glucosidase and maintained similar inhibitory action as the berries. Highbush blueberry cultivars and their fermented beverages are good natural sources of antioxidants and starch-degrading enzyme inhibitors important for type 2 diabetes management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Efficacy and Safety of Acarbose in Metformin-Treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
Rosenstock, J., Brown, A., Fischer, J., Jain, A., Littlejohn, T., Nadeau, D., Sussman, A., Taylor, T., Krol, A., & Magner, J. (1998) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.21.12.2050 · Cited by 93
Cited by
Qi, Q., Chu, M., Yu, X., Xie, Y., Li, Y., Du, Y., Liu, X., Zhang, Z., Shi, J., & Yan, N. (2023) · Food Reviews International · doi:10.1080/87559129.2022.2029479 · Cited by 280
Podsędek, A., Majewska, I., Redzynia, M., Sosnowska, D., & Koziołkiewicz, M. (2014) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf5008264 · Cited by 266
Vilcacundo, R., Martínez-Villaluenga, C., & Hernández-Ledesma, B. (2017) · Journal of Functional Foods · doi:10.1016/j.jff.2017.06.024 · Cited by 264
Strawberries, Blueberries, and Cranberries in the Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Perspectives
Basu, A., & Lyons, T. J. (2012) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf203488k · Cited by 116
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, M. H., Lucius, A., Meyer, T., & Gonzalez de Mejia, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-07-25
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 8923-8930
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W1968078924
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cultivar Evaluation and Effect of Fermentation on Antioxidant Capacity and in Vitro Inhibition of α-Amylase and α-Glucosidase by Highbush Blueberry (Vaccinium corombosum). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jf201720z
- The paper
- Johnson, M. H., Lucius, A., Meyer, T., & Gonzalez de Mejia, E. (2011). Cultivar Evaluation and Effect of Fermentation on Antioxidant Capacity and in Vitro Inhibition of α-Amylase and α-Glucosidase by Highbush Blueberry (Vaccinium corombosum). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf201720z
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.