Cited by 154Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsAnalytical chemistry methods developmentPesticide Residue Analysis and Safety

Levels of Bisphenol A in Canned Soft Drink Products in Canadian Markets

Cao, Xu-Liang, Corriveau, Jeannette, Popovic, Svetlana·2009·Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Abstract

The method developed previously for the determination of bisphenol A (BPA) in liquid infant formula was adapted and validated for determination of BPA in soft drink products. This method was based on solid phase extraction and derivatization with acetic anhydride followed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry in selected-ion monitoring mode. The average method detection limit was 0.045 microg/L for a 10 mL sample. The average extraction recoveries were 101 and 99.9% obtained with seven different soft drink products spiked with BPA at 0.5 and 2.5 microg/L, respectively. Good repeatability of the method was observed with replicate analyses of seven different soft drinks; relative standard deviations ranged from 1.3 to 6.6%. This method was used to analyze samples of 72 canned soft drink products for BPA. Except for three products from which BPA-d16 could not be recovered at all due to interference of product compositions (e.g., quinine hydrochloride in tonic water), BPA was detected in samples of all the other products at levels ranging from 0.032 to 4.5 microg/L. About 75% of the products had BPA levels of <0.5 microg/L, and 85% of the products had BPA levels of <1 microg/L. Exposure to BPA through consumption of canned soft drink products is low; dietary intake of BPA was estimated at 0.027 microg/kg of body weight/day on the basis of the consumption of one canned soft drink with the highest BPA level (4.5 microg/L) for an adult with a 60 kg body weight, well below the prov…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jf803213g

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cao, X.-L., Corriveau, J., & Popovic, S.
Affiliations
Health Canada (CA)
Corresponding author
Cao, Xu-Liang
Venue
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Published
2009-02-25
Volume
57
Issue
4
Pages
1307-1311
ISSN
  • 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5118
OpenAlex
W2077057725
Cited by
154
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 11
FWCI
8.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
Keywords
bisphenol A, canned beverages, dietary exposure, solid-phase extraction, acetic anhydride derivatization, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, method validation, dietary assessment, tolerable daily intake, Health Canada
MeSH terms
Bisphenol A Compounds, Benzhydryl Compounds, Beverages, Canada, Carbonated Beverages, Estrogens, Non-Steroidal, Food Contamination, Food Preservation, Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Phenols, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review