Cited by 87Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Bisphenol A Impairs Synaptic Plasticity by Both Pre‐ and Postsynaptic Mechanisms

Open access
Hu, Fan, Li, Tingting, Gong, Huarui, Chen, Zhi, Jin, Yan, Xu, Guangwei, Wang, Ming·2017·Advanced Science

Abstract

Bisphenol A (BPA), an environmental xenoestrogen, has been reported to induce learning and memory impairments in rodent animals. However, effects of BPA exposure on synaptic plasticity and the underlying physiological mechanisms remain elusive. Our behavioral and electrophysiological analyses show that BPA obviously perturbs hippocampal spatial memory of juvenile Sprague–Dawley rats after four weeks exposure, with significantly impaired long‐term potentiation (LTP) in the hippocampus. These effects involve decreased spine density of pyramidal neurons, especially the apical dendritic spine. Further presynaptic findings show an overt inhibition of pulse‐paired facilitation during electrophysiological recording, which suggest the decrease of presynaptic transmitter release and is consistent with reduced production of presynaptic glutamate after BPA exposure. Meanwhile, LTP‐related glutamate receptors, NMDA receptor 2A (NR2A) and AMPA receptor 1 (GluR1), are significantly downregulated in BPA‐exposed rats. Excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) results also show that EPSC NMDA , but not EPSC AMPA , is declined by 40% compared to the baseline in BPA‐perfused brain slices. Taken together, these findings reveal that juvenile BPA exposure has negative effects on synaptic plasticity, which result from decreases in dendritic spine density and excitatory synaptic transmission. Importantly, this study also provides new insights into the dynamics of BPA‐induced memory deterioration during the whole life of rats.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Juvenile BPA exposure in male Sprague–Dawley rats impaired hippocampus-dependent spatial memory and hippocampal CA1 synaptic plasticity, with both presynaptic and postsynaptic deficits. The authors link these effects to decreased dendritic spine density, reduced glutamate release/synthesis, and downregulated NR2A and GluR1.

Key findings

  • BPA crossed the blood–brain barrier: CSF BPA was 4.36 ± 2.28 ng mL−1 in exposed rats versus 0.17 ± 0.07 ng mL−1 in controls (n = 8 per group, p < 0.05).
  • BPA-exposed rats showed spatial memory impairment without learning deficit: less time in the MWM target quadrant (p < 0.05) and less novel-arm time/entries in the Y maze (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01), with no swimming speed/distance differences.
  • LTP was impaired in CA1: BPA produced 133.11 ± 16.17% fEPSP slope potentiation versus 199.63 ± 39.51% in controls 60 min after HFS (p < 0.01).
  • Synaptic mechanisms included ~20% lower total dendritic spine density (p < 0.01), apical spine density reduced to two thirds of control (p < 0.01), decreased PPF ratio (141 ± 11% vs 191.83 ± 23%, p < 0.01), 22.47% lower glutamate release (p < 0.05), and ~40% lower EPSCNMDA after acute BPA (282.13 ± 10.32 pA to 151.88 ± 8.73 pA, p < 0.01), while EPSCAMPA did not significantly change.

Methods

  • Male Sprague–Dawley rats were orally treated with BPA (1 mg kg−1 d−1 in DMSO) or vehicle from postnatal 21–24 to 49–52 d; controls received equivalent DMSO.
  • Behavioral testing used Morris water maze, Y maze, and open field; electrophysiology measured Sch–CA1 fEPSP input/output, paired-pulse facilitation, and LTP after high-frequency stimulation; Golgi–Cox staining assessed dendritic length and spine density; Western blot measured glutamate receptor subunits; patch clamp measured EPSCNMDA and EPSCAMPA in acute BPA-treated slices; ELISA/activity assays measured glutamate release and glutaminase activity.
  • Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M.; unpaired two-tailed t-tests and repeated measures ANOVA were used, with p < 0.05 considered significant.

Limitations

  • The paper states that future studies are required to investigate dose-dependent effects of BPA on juvenile behaviors and to explore molecular mechanisms of BPA-induced synaptic changes.
  • Evident from the text: only male rats were used, only one BPA dose (1 mg kg−1 d−1) was tested, and exposure was limited to the juvenile period, so sex differences, dose–response relationships, and other developmental windows are not addressed.
  • Evident from the text: several experiments used small group sizes (8–10 rats per group), and the study reports associative physiological and morphological changes rather than direct causal molecular pathways.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/advs.201600493

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

7 of 24 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    A positive relationship between spine morphology and LTP induction has been demonstrated.

    “A positive relationship between spine morphology and LTP induction has been demonstrated.14”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [14] X. Yu, Y. Zuo, Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2011, 21, 169. 20728341 PMC2991530 source

      The Methods (Spine Synapses; page unavailable) describe counting asymmetric spine synapses, and the Discussion (page unavailable) links synapse number to working-memory performance. Searches for LTP induction, long-term potentiation, and potentiation found no passage addressing a relationship between spine morphology and LTP induction. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    17β-estradiol interaction with estrogen receptors has the potential to heighten the magnitude of LTP at hippocampal CA3-CA1 synapses in rats.

    “It has been found that 17β‐estradiol interaction with estrogen receptors has potential to heighten the magnitude of LTP at hippocampal CA3–CA1 synapses in rats.24”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [24] a) C. C. Smith, L. C. Vedder, L. L. McMahon, Psychoneuroendocrinology 2009, 34, S130; 19596521 PMC2796081 b) J. L. Spencer, E. M. Waters, R. D. Romeo, G. E. Wood, T. A. Milner, B. S. McEwen, Front. Neuroendocrinol. 2008, 29, 219; 18078984 PMC2440702 c) C. C. Smith, L. L. McMahon, J. Neurosci. 2005, 25, 7780. 16120779 PMC6725261 source

      The Molecular mechanisms of synaptic function in vivo section discusses LTP studies in hippocampal cultured slices, but not estradiol, estrogen receptors, or LTP magnitude at rat CA3–CA1 synapses. Searches for those terms and their paraphrases found no passage addressing the claim. Page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.73)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Interpretationown data

    BPA crosses the blood-brain barrier in the CNS.

    “This confirms that BPA could pass across the BBB,17”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [17] Y. Sun, M. N. Nakashima, M. Takahashi, N. Kuroda, K. Nakashima, Biomed. Chromatogr. 2002, 16, 319. 12210505 source

      The paper’s Abstract discusses possible effects of BPA exposure on brain development, and the Discussion mentions potential brain-related mechanisms, but neither passage addresses whether BPA crosses the blood-brain barrier. Searches for “blood-brain barrier,” “BBB,” and entry into the CNS found no passage establishing that point. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.70)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Decrease of synapsin I phosphorylation can enable less vesicles to be released during presynaptic depolarization.

    “which can enable less vesicles to be released during the presynaptic depolarization.34”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [34] R. Llinas, J. A. Gruner, M. Sugimori, T. L. McGuinness, P. Greengard, J. Physiol. 1991, 436, 257. 1676419 PMC1181504 source

      The Discussion describes changes in proteins involved in synaptic signaling and vesicle trafficking, but does not address whether reduced synapsin I phosphorylation limits vesicle release during presynaptic depolarization. A References entry calls synapsin I a synaptic vesicle protein; searches for synapsin I phosphorylation and presynaptic vesicle release found no passage making the claimed connection. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Developmental BPA exposure in cultured hypothalamic cells causes a decrease of synapsin I phosphorylation.

    “developmental BPA exposure in cultured hypothalamic cells causes decrease of synapsin I phosphorylation,33”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [33] T. Iwakura, M. Iwafuchi, D. Muraoka, M. Yokosuka, T. Shiga, C. Watanabe, R. Ohtani‐Kaneko, Toxicology 2010, 272, 52. 20399245 source

      The Neuronal cultures and Western blotting assay sections describe lead-treated hippocampal neurons and measurement of β-catenin phosphorylation, not BPA-treated hypothalamic cells or synapsin I phosphorylation. Searches for BPA, hypothalamic cells, and synapsin phosphorylation found no passage addressing the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 11
  • May combine two claims. 13
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    17β-estradiol enhances dendritic apical spine density of CA1 pyramidal neurons in the hippocampus via ERK and mTOR activation.

    “17β‐estradiol has been shown to enhance dendritic apical spine density of CA1 pyramidal neurons in the hippocampus, via ERK and mTOR activation.[[qv: 24a,26]]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites 24a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [26] J. J. Tuscher, V. Luine, M. Frankfurt, K. M. Frick, J. Neurosci. 2016, 36, 1483. 26843632 PMC4737764 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Chronic BPA exposure during pregnancy and lactation can induce memory deficits later in the life of rats, including impaired spatial recognition memory in mid-adolescence and deficient spatial learning and memory in juvenile and adult rats.

    “chronic BPA exposure in pregnancy and lactation (the critical periods of brain development) could induce memory deficits later in the life of rats, such as impaired spatial recognition memory in mid‐adolescence,6 and deficient spatial learning and memory in juvenile and adult.7”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [6] A. Poimenova, E. Markaki, C. Rahiotis, E. Kitraki, Neuroscience 2010, 167, 741. 20219646 source
    • cites [7] a) R. Kuwahara, S. Kawaguchi, Y. Kohara, H. Cui, K. Yamashita, J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2013, 123, 132; 24077108 b) M. E. Rebuli, L. Camacho, M. E. Adonay, D. M. Reif, D. L. Aylor, H. B. Patisaul, Toxicol. Sci. 2015, 148, 341. 26209558 PMC4683367 source

      The Introduction says only that animal and human studies have associated BPA exposure with adverse neurodevelopmental effects. Searches for pregnancy and lactation exposure, rat spatial recognition, and spatial learning found no passage addressing the claimed memory deficits or ages; the paper assesses dietary BPA exposure instead. (LLM, conf=0.74)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    BPA-exposed rats had lower frequency of entry into the novel arm and higher frequency of entry into the home arm than the control group (p < 0.01).

    “BPA‐exposed rats had lower frequency of entry into the novel arm and higher frequency of entry into the home arm than the control group (p < 0.01, Figure 2I).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    BPA-treated rats showed no difference in swimming speed and total swimming distance compared with control rats (p > 0.05).

    “Notably, BPA‐treated rats showed no difference in swimming speed and total swimming distance with control rats (p > 0.05, Figure 2E,F).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    During the probe test, escape latency of BPA-treated rats showed no significant difference from control, but an increasing trend (p > 0.05).

    “During probe test, escape latency of BPA‐treated rats showed no significant difference with the control group, but an increasing trend (p > 0.05, Figure 2D).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There was a significant decrease in NR2A and GluR1 expression levels (n = 8 rats per group, p < 0.05) but not in the remaining subunits.

    “there was a significant decrease in NR2A and GluR1 expression levels (n = 8 rats per group, p < 0.05) but not in the remaining subunits.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Synaptic transmissions mediated by NMDA receptors were deranged after BPA exposure, contributing to the reduced LTP.

    “These results suggest that synaptic transmissions mediated by NMDA receptors (NR) were deranged after BPA exposure, contributing to the reduced LTP.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The presence of GluR1 and the deficiency of GluR2 in AMPA receptors contribute to LTP enhancement.

    “the presence of GluR1 as well as the deficient of GluR2 in AMPA receptors has a contribution to LTP enhancement.[[qv: 15b]]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [[qv: 15b]]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Altered synaptic transmission contributed to BPA-induced cognitive impairment, with decreased presynaptic glutamate synthesis and release and excitatory receptor expression.

    “Meanwhile, altered synaptic transmission also contributed to BPA‐induced cognitive impairment, with the decrease of presynaptic glutamate synthesis and release, and excitatory receptors expression.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Induction of LTP at Sch-CA1 synapses is dependent on glutamate receptors, especially NR2A, NR2B, GluR1, and GluR2.

    “Induction of LTP at Sch‐CA1 synapses is dependent on glutamate receptors, especially NR2A, NR2B, GluR1, and GluR2.15”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [15] a) K. Prybylowski, R. J. Wenthold, J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 9673; 14742424 b) S. Rumpel, J. LeDoux, A. Zador, R. Malinow, Science 2005, 308, 83. 15746389 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Juvenile BPA exposure resulted in hippocampal-dependent spatial memory impairment without a learning deficit.

    “The current training and probe test results suggest that juvenile BPA exposure resulted in hippocampal‐dependent spatial memory impairment without learning deficit.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Over-stimulating NMDA receptors (NRs) could increase Ca2+ influx, which then induces short- or long-term alterations in the hippocampus, such as LTP.

    “Over‐stimulating of NRs could increase Ca2+ influx, which then induces short‐ or long‐term alterations in the hippocampus, e.g., LTP.[[qv: 15a]]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [[qv: 15a]]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Juvenile BPA exposure inhibited LTP induction in the hippocampal CA1 areas after HFS of Sch in the CA3 areas, which underlies BPA-related memory deficits involving synapse plasticity changes.

    “Our results showed that juvenile BPA exposure inhibited LTP induction in the hippocampal CA1 areas after HFS of Sch in the CA3 areas (Figure 3B), which underlies BPA related memory deficits involving synapse plasticity changes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Synaptic plasticity, including LTP and LTD, is the cellular basis of learning and memory at the physiological level.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The different signaling properties of NMDA receptors (NRs) are mainly due to their different subunit compositions.

    “The different signaling properties of NRs are mainly due to their different subunit compositions.28”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [28] V. R. Rao, S. Finkbeiner, Trends Neurosci. 2007, 30, 284. 17418904 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Dendritic spines of pyramidal neurons receive most excitatory connections from presynaptic glutamatergic projections.

    “Dendritic spines of pyramidal neurons are small protrusions from the dendritic shafts and receive most excitatory connections from presynaptic glutamatergic projections.13”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [13] N. L. Rochefort, A. Konnerth, EMBO Rep. 2012, 13, 699. 22791026 PMC3410382 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Paired-pulse facilitation is a presynaptic form of short-term synaptic plasticity due to enhanced presynaptic transmitter release in response to the second of two closely spaced action potentials during field potential recording.

    “Paired‐pulse facilitation (PPF) is a presynaptic form of short‐term synaptic plasticity due to enhanced presynaptic transmitter release in response to the second of two closely spaced action potentials during field potential recording.16”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [16] R. S. Zucker, W. G. Regehr, Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2002, 64, 355. 11826273 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of University of Science and Technology of China, P. R. China.

    “The study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of University of Science and Technology of China, P. R. China.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    BPA exerts estrogen antagonist activity to induce reestablishment of excitatory synaptic transmission and impairment of synaptic plasticity.

    “which underlies BPA exerting estrogen antagonist activity to induce reestablishment of excitatory synaptic transmission and impairment of synaptic plasticity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: BPA acts as an estrogen antagonist.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    All animal experiments were performed according to the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

    “All animal experiments were performed according to the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    LTP expression includes the presynaptic locus associated with paired-pulse facilitation (PPF) ratio changes.

    “It is well known that LTP expression includes the presynaptic locus associated with PPF ratio changes.31”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [31] a) P. E. Schulz, E. P. Cook, D. Johnston, J. Neurosci. 1994, 14, 5325; 7916043 PMC6577083 b) S. S. Yu, M. Wang, X. M. Li, W. H. Chen, J. T. Chen, H. L. Wang, D. Y. Ruan, BMC Dev. Biol. 2007, 7, 51; 17511882 PMC1888697 c) G. Mereu, M. Cammalleri, M. Fa, W. Francesconi, P. Saba, M. Tattoli, L. Trabace, A. Vaccari, V. Cuomo, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2000, 294, 728. 10900254 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    17β-estrogen enhances learning and LTP magnitude by increasing the ratio of NMDA transmission to AMPA transmission.

    “17β‐estrogen enhances learning and LTP magnitude by increasing the ratio of NMDA transmission to AMPA transmission,[[qv: 24c]]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [[qv: 24c]]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Juvenile BPA exposure caused profound neurocognitive deterioration in spatial memory and synaptic plasticity.

    “the present study shows that juvenile BPA exposure caused profound neurocognitive deterioration in spatial memory and synaptic plasticity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
22 of 22
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Synaptic plasticity, including LTP and LTD, is the cellular basis of learning and memory at the physiological level.

    “Synaptic plasticity, including long‐term potentiation and depression (LTP and LTD), has been recognized as the cellular basis of learning and memory at the physiological level.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Reports assessing how physiological functions degrade in BPA-exposed rodents are scarce.

    “Currently, reports assessing how physiological functions degrade in BPA‐exposed rodents are scarce.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    NR is one of the crucial synaptic elements for activity-dependent synaptic plasticity.

    “NR is considered one of the crucial synaptic elements for activity‐dependent synaptic plasticity.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    PPF in hippocampal CA1 areas is an indicator of presynaptic transmitter release probability.

    “PPF in the hippocampal CA1 areas is a transient form of presynaptic plasticity, which is considered an indicator of presynaptic transmitter release probability.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    BPA acts as an estrogen antagonist.

    “which underlies BPA exerting estrogen antagonist activity to induce reestablishment of excitatory synaptic transmission and impairment of synaptic plasticity.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The exposure concentration used (1 mg/kg/day) is much lower than the currently accepted lowest observed adverse effect level (50 mg/kg/day).

    “The exposure concentration mentioned above was much lower than the currently accepted lowest observed adverse effect level (50 mg kg−1 d−1).”
6 of 6

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Spine-analysis rat count differs between results and methods

    Major

    The morphology results specify 10 rats per group, whereas the Golgi-Cox staining method specifies eight per group.

  • Electrophysiology sample size differs between results and methods

    Major

    The field-potential results report 10 rats per group, but the corresponding in vivo recording method specifies eight per group.

  • Neuron counts per rat differ between results and methods

    Major

    The results describe including 10-12 pyramidal neurons in each rat, but the morphology method says 5-6 neurons from each brain were used.

  • Exposure duration does not match the stated ages

    Minor

    Exposure from postnatal day 21 to day 49 spans 28 days, not the 38 days reported for juvenile exposure.

    Reported 38 · recomputed 28

  • CSF sample size differs between results and methods

    Minor

    The CSF BPA result states eight rats per group, while the BPA-detection method states 16 rats per group.

5 of 5

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Wang Z., 2016, Adv. Sci., 1600248, 1
  2. Amaral D., 2006, The Hippocampus Book
  3. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.07.030 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hu, F., Li, T., Gong, H., Chen, Z., Jin, Y., Xu, G., & Wang, M.
Affiliations
  • Hefei University of Technology (CN)
  • CAS Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Diseases School of Life Sciences University of Science and Technology of China Hefei Anhui 230027 P. R. China
  • University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Hu, Fan
  • Wang, Ming
Venue
Advanced Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-04-19
Volume
4
Issue
8
Pages
1600493-1600493
ISSN
2198-3844 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2606968215
Cited by
87
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Advanced Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (21307024)
  • China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2013M531500)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
bisphenol A, synaptic plasticity, long-term potentiation, dendritic spine density, presynaptic neurotransmitter release, excitatory postsynaptic currents, xenoestrogens, learning and memory impairment, juvenile exposure, glutamate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-12.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-12.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review