The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparative Evaluation of Quercetin, Isoquercetin and Rutin as Inhibitors of α-Glucosidase
Abstract
Three flavonoids from tartary buckwheat bran, namely, quercetin (Que), isoquercetin (Iso) and rutin (Rut), have been evaluated as alpha-glucosidase inhibitors by fluorescence spectroscopy and enzymatic kinetics and have also been compared with the market diabetes healer, acarbose. The results indicated that Que, Iso and Rut could bind alpha-glucosidase to form a new complex, which exhibited a strong static fluorescence quenching via nonradiation energy transfer, and an obvious blue shift of maximum fluorescence. The sequence of binding constants (K(A)) was Que > Iso > Rut, and the number of binding sites was one for all of the three cases. The thermodynamic parameters were obtained by calculations based on data of binding constants. They revealed that the main driving force of the above-mentioned interaction was hydrophobic. Enzymatic kinetics measurements showed that all of the three compounds were effective inhibitors against alpha-glucosidase. Inhibitory modes all belonged to a mixed type of noncompetitive and anticompetitive. The sequence of affinity (1/K(i)) was in accordance with the results of binding constants (K(A)). The concentrations which gave 50% inhibition (IC(50)) were 0.017 mmol*L(-1), 0.185 mmol*L(-1) and 0.196 mmol*L(-1), compared with acarbose's IC(50) (0.091 mmol*L(-1)); the dose of acarbose was almost five times of that of Que and half of that of Iso and Rut. Our results explained why the inhibition on alpha-glucosidase of tartary buckwheat bran extractive substance (mainly Rut) was much weaker than that of its hydrolysis product (a mixture of Que, Iso and Rut). This work would be significant for the development of more powerful antidiabetes drugs and efficacious utilization of tartary buckwheat, which has been proved as an acknowledged food in the diet of diabetic patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Natural products for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: Pharmacology and mechanisms
Xu, L., Li, Y., Dai, Y., & Peng, J. (2018) · Pharmacological Research · doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2018.01.015 · Cited by 452
Self-citationAn overview on the role of bioactive α-glucosidase inhibitors in ameliorating diabetic complications
Hossain, U., Das, A. K., Ghosh, S., & Sil, P. C. (2020) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.fct.2020.111738 · Cited by 438
Proença, C., Freitas, M., Ribeiro, D., Oliveira, E. F. T., Sousa, J. L. C., Tomé, S. M., Ramos, M. J., Silva, A. M. S., Fernandes, P. A., & Fernandes, E. (2017) · Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1080/14756366.2017.1368503 · Cited by 432
Yilmazer-Musa, M., Griffith, A. M., Michels, A. J., Schneider, E., & Frei, B. (2012) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf301147n · Cited by 411
Flavonols and cardiovascular disease
Perez-Vizcaino, F., & Duarte, J. (2010) · Molecular Aspects of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.mam.2010.09.002 · Cited by 393
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, Y. Q., Zhou, F. C., Gao, F., Bian, J. S., & Shan, F.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-12-23
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 11463-11468
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W2054209992
- Cited by
- 496
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative Evaluation of Quercetin, Isoquercetin and Rutin as Inhibitors of α-Glucosidase. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jf903083h
- The paper
- Li, Y. Q., Zhou, F. C., Gao, F., Bian, J. S., & Shan, F. (2009). Comparative Evaluation of Quercetin, Isoquercetin and Rutin as Inhibitors of α-Glucosidase. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf903083h
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.