Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 315

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lignin Extraction from Straw by Ionic Liquids and Enzymatic Hydrolysis of the Cellulosic Residues

Fu, Dongbao, Mazza, Giuseppe, Tamaki, Yukihiro·2010·Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Abstract

Lignocellulose is a promising starting material for bioproducts, ranging from biofuels to specialty chemicals; however, lignocellulose is resistant to enzymatic degradation. Overcoming this resistance is therefore an important priority for the development of the lignocellulosic biorefinery concept. In this work, 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate ([emim]Ac) was selected from six ionic liquid candidates for the extraction of lignin from triticale and wheat straw and flax shives. Lignin extractability, composition, and cellulose enzymatic digestibility of the residues after extraction by [emim]Ac were determined at various temperatures (70-150 degrees C) and time intervals (0.5-24 h). The optimal result (52.7% of acid insoluble lignin in triticale straw) was obtained at 150 degrees C after 90 min, yielding >95% cellulose digestibility of the residue. Little cellulose was extracted, and the extracted lignin was recovered by acid precipitation. Selective extraction of lignin by ionic liquids is a potentially efficient technique for the comprehensive utilization of lignocellulose.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jf903616y

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 315

Metadata

Authors
Fu, D., Mazza, G., & Tamaki, Y.
Venue
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Published
2010-02-10
Volume
58
Issue
5
Pages
2915-2922
ISSN
  • 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5118
OpenAlex
W1968721842
Cited by
315
References
2
FWCI
16.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.