The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Composition of Polyphenols in Fresh Tea Leaves and Associations of Their Oxygen-Radical-Absorbing Capacity with Antiproliferative Actions in Fibroblast Cells
Abstract
The polyphenols in various parts of the tea plant used in manufacture of tea products (young leaves, old leaves, and stem) were analyzed by HPLC. The young leaves (apical bud and the two youngest leaves) were found to be richer (2.7-fold) in polyphenols than old leaves (from the tenth to the fifth leaf). Also, the tea polyphenols were found to be higher (1.4-fold) in summer than in spring. Ten different types of commercial tea (manufactured tea), including unfermented, semifermented, and fermented tea, were analyzed for their polyphenol compounds, and it was found that both yields of solids in tea water extracts (TWEs) and the amount of (−)-epigallocatechin 3-gallate (EGCG) in these products varied with different tea leaves and processing methods. Longjing tea (unfermented green tea) contained the highest concentration of EGCG and polyphenols, whereas Assam black tea (most fermented) contained the least. Longjing TWEs showed strong inhibitory effect on DNA synthesis in A-431 tumor cells. We also found that green tea polyphenols (GTPs) and EGCG strongly inhibited tumor cell DNA synthesis and peroxyl-radical generation. The evidence suggests that the strong antioxidative and antiproliferative activities of Longjing TWEs and GTPs are mainly due to the higher contents of tea polyphenols. EGCG (the major component of GTPs) showed strong inhibitory action on the growth of immortalized cells (NIH3T3) and tumor cells (S-180II) but almost no effect on the growth of normal cells (C3H10T1/2). Keywords: Polyphenols; EGCG; antiproliferative effect; antioxidative effect; tea water extracts
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Total Antioxidant Capacity of Teas by the Ferric Reducing/Antioxidant Power Assay
Benzie, I. F. F., & Szeto, Y. T. (1999) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf9807768 · Cited by 756
Prasanth, M. I., Sivamaruthi, B. S., Chaiyasut, C., & Tencomnao, T. (2019) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu11020474 · Cited by 457
Li, C.-F., Zhu, Y., Yu, Y., Zhao, Q.-Y., Wang, S.-J., Wang, X.-C., Yao, M.-Z., Luo, D., Li, X., Chen, L., et al. (2015) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-015-1773-0 · Cited by 180
Small molecule modulators of protein-protein interactions: selected case studies
Aeluri, M., Chamakuri, S., Dasari, B., Guduru, S. K. R., Jimmidi, R., Jogula, S., & Arya, P. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr4004049 · Cited by 79
Ayakdaş, G., & Ağagündüz, D. (2025) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods14132313 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Lin, Y.-L., Juan, I.-M., Chen, Y.-L., Liang, Y.-C., & Lin, J.-K.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1996-01-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1387-1394
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W2081144322
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
