The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Odorants of Virgin Olive Oils with Different Flavor Profiles
Abstract
The potent odorants of virgin olive oils from Italy (I), Spain (S), and Morocco (M) were screened by aroma extract dilution analyses and gas chromatography olfactometry of headspace samples. After quantification, odor activity values (OAVs) were calculated by dividing the concentrations of the odorants in the oil samples by their nasally and retronasally determined odor threshold values in sunflower oil. On the basis of the nasal thresholds, the following compounds showed high OAVs in the oils given in parentheses: acetaldehyde (I, S, M), acetic acid (I, S), propanal (I), 1-penten-3-one (I), ( E, Z )-2,4-decadienal (I, M), trans -4,5-epoxy-( E )-2-decenal (I, S, M), ( Z )-3-hexenal (I, M), ( E )-2-hexenal (I), ( Z )-3-hexenyl acetate (I), 4-methoxy-2-methyl-2-butanethiol (S), ethyl 2- and 3-methylbutyrate (S, M), 2- and 3-methylbutanal (S), ethyl cyclohexylcarboxylate (M), and ethyl isobutyrate (M). Higher OAVs were additionally found for hexanal (I) and ( Z )-2-nonenal (I, M) when retronasal odor thresholds were used as the basis. The potent odorants were dissolved in a refined plant oil in the concentrations found in the three olive oil samples. The flavor profiles of the models obtained were very close to those of the real samples, indicating that the different notes in the flavor profiles of these oils could be reproduced, e.g., green, fruity, black currantlike. Models missing one or several compounds with the same odor quality gave an insight into the importance of the odorants contributing to the flavor profiles of the oil samples. Keywords: Aroma extract dilution analysis; flavor analysis; flavor differences; flavor imitation; flavor profile analysis; isotope dilution asssay; sensory study; virgin olive oil
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Olive oil volatile compounds, flavour development and quality: A critical review
Kalua, C. M., Allen, M. S., Bedgood, D. R., Bishop, A. G., Prenzler, P. D., & Robards, K. (2007) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.09.059 · Cited by 677
Evaluation of the Key Odorants of Foods by Dilution Experiments, Aroma Models and Omission
Grosch, W. (2001) · Chemical Senses · doi:10.1093/chemse/26.5.533 · Cited by 640
Self-citationGas chromatography–olfactometry in food flavour analysis
d’Acampora Zellner, B., Dugo, P., Dugo, G., & Mondello, L. (2008) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2007.09.006 · Cited by 269
Potent odorants of raw Arabica coffee. Their changes during roasting
Czerny, M., & Grosch, W. (2000) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf990609n · Cited by 232
Self-citationSensorial Contribution and Formation Pathways of Thiols in Foods: A Review
Vermeulen, C., Gijs, L., & Collin, S. (2005) · Food Reviews International · doi:10.1081/fri-200040601 · Cited by 131
Metadata
- Authors
- Reiners, J., & Grosch, W.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1998-06-26
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2754-2763
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W2064349996
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.