The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Variation of Glucosinolates in Vegetable Crops of Brassica oleracea
Abstract
Glucosinolates were evaluated in 5 groups and 65 accessions of Brassica oleracea (50 broccoli, 4 Brussels sprouts, 6 cabbage, 3 cauliflower, and 2 kale) grown under uniform cultural conditions. Glucosinolates and their concentrations varied among the different groups and within each group. The predominant glucosinolates in broccoli were 4-methylsulfinylbutyl glucosinolate (glucoraphanin), 3-butenyl glucosinolate (gluconapin), and 3-indolylmethyl glucosinoate (glucobrassicin). Glucoraphanin concentration in broccoli ranged from 0.8 micromol g(-1) DW in EV6-1 to 21.7 micromol g(-1) DW in Brigadier. Concentrations of the other glucosinolates in broccoli varied similarly over a wide range. In Brussels sprouts, cabbage, cauliflower, and kale, the predominant glucosinolates were sinigrin (8.9, 7.8, 9.3, and 10.4 micromol g(-1) DW, respectively) and glucobrassicin (3.2, 0.9, 1.3, and 1.2 micromol g(-1) DW, respectively). Brussels sprouts also had significant amounts of gluconapin (6.9 micromol g(-1) DW). Wide variations in glucosinolate content among genotypes suggest differences in their health-promoting properties and the opportunity for enhancement of their levels through genetic manipulation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Glucosinolates, isothiocyanates and human health
Traka, M., & Mithen, R. (2009) · Phytochemistry Reviews · doi:10.1007/s11101-008-9103-7 · Cited by 490
Protective effect of sulforaphane against oxidative stress: Recent advances
Guerrero-Beltrán, C. E., Calderón-Oliver, M., Pedraza-Chaverri, J., & Chirino, Y. I. (2012) · Experimental and Toxicologic Pathology · doi:10.1016/j.etp.2010.11.005 · Cited by 320
Unintended compositional changes in genetically modified (GM) crops: 20 years of research
Herman, R. A., & Price, W. D. (2013) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf400135r · Cited by 156
Plant-Derived Biomolecules in Fermented Cabbage
Tolonen, M., Taipale, M., Viander, B., Pihlava, J.-M., Korhonen, H., & Ryhänen, E.-L. (2002) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf0109017 · Cited by 107
Fruits and Vegetables of Moderate Climate
Christensen, L. P., Edelenbos, M., & Kreutzmann, S. (2007) · Flavours and Fragrances · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-49339-6_7 · Cited by 65
Assessing the natural variability in crop composition
Harrigan, G. G., Glenn, K. C., & Ridley, W. P. (2010) · Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.08.023 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Kushad, M. M., Brown, A. F., Kurilich, A. C., Juvik, J. A., Klein, B. P., Wallig, M. A., & Jeffery, E. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1999-03-17
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1541-1548
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W2028204224
- Cited by
- 596
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.