The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identification of Impact Odorants in Bordeaux Red Grape Juice, in the Commercial Yeast Used for Its Fermentation, and in the Produced Wine
Abstract
The aroma extract dilution analysis method was used to detect the impact odorants of Bordeaux Cabernet Sauvignon and Merlot wines extracts, as well as those of the extracts of the corresponding Cabernet Sauvignon juice and dry yeasts used for its fermentation. The wines and the yeasts were extracted using dichloromethane, and the juice was extracted using Amberlite XAD-2. Structural identification of the impact odorants using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and atomic emission detection (sulfur acquisition) was achieved after enrichment of these extracts by silica gel and Affi-Gel 501 chromatography. The same odorants (with the exception of dimethyl sulfide among 48) were detected in both wine extracts, with about the same flavor dilution (FD) factors. The 18 impact odorants detected in the Cabernet Sauvignon juice and dry yeast extracts were also found in the wine extracts. The odorants with the highest FD factors were 3-(methylsulfanyl)propanal, (E,Z)-nona-2, 6-dienal, and decanal in the juice extract, 2-methyl-3-sulfanylfuran, 3-(methylsulfanyl)propanal, 2-/3-methylbutanoic acids, and phenylethanal in the dry yeast extract, and 2-/3-methylbutanols, 2-phenylethanol, 2-methyl-3-sulfanylfuran, acetic acid, 3-(methylsulfanyl)propanal, 2-/3-methylbutanoic acids, beta-damascenone, 3-sulfanylhexan-1-ol, Furaneol, and homofuraneol in the wine extracts. Determination of the odor thresholds of some of these impact odorants was carried out.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Darriet, P., Tominaga, T., Lavigne, V., Boidron, J., & Dubourdieu, D. (1995) · Flavour and Fragrance Journal · doi:10.1002/ffj.2730100610 · Cited by 325
Kotseridis, Y., Baumes, R., & Skouroumounis, G. K. (1998) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/s0021-9673(98)00650-5 · Cited by 80
Self-citation
Cited by
Escudero, A., Campo, E., Fariña, L., Cacho, J., & Ferreira, V. (2007) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf0636418 · Cited by 615
Yeast Modulation of Wine Flavor
Swiegers, J. H., & Pretorius, I. S. (2005) · Advances in Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2164(05)57005-9 · Cited by 390
Sensorial Contribution and Formation Pathways of Thiols in Foods: A Review
Vermeulen, C., Gijs, L., & Collin, S. (2005) · Food Reviews International · doi:10.1081/fri-200040601 · Cited by 131
Coelho, E., Vilanova, M., Genisheva, Z., Oliveira, J. M., Teixeira, J. A., & Domingues, L. (2015) · LWT - Food Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2015.02.020 · Cited by 42
Vinegar production from fruit concentrates: effect on volatile composition and antioxidant activity
Coelho, E., Genisheva, Z., Oliveira, J. M., Teixeira, J. A., & Domingues, L. (2017) · Journal of Food Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s13197-017-2783-5 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Kotseridis, Y., & Baumes, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2000-01-21
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 400-406
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W1974625872
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.