The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antioxidant Activity and Total Phenolics in Selected Cereal Grains and Their Different Morphological Fractions
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the antioxidant properties of water and 80% methanolic extracts of cereal grains and their different morphological fractions. Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cv. Almari and cv. Henika, barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cv. Gregor and cv. Mobek, rye (Secale cereale L.) cv. Dańkowskie Zlote, oat (Avena sativa L.) cv. Slawko and buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) cv. Kora were used. PC (L-alpha-phosphatidylcholine) liposome system and spectrophotometric assay of total antioxidant activity (TAA) were used to evaluate the antioxidative activity of extracts. Among the water extracts, only the one prepared from buckwheat exhibited antioxidant activity at the concentration analyzed. The following hierarchy of antioxidant activity was provided for 80% methanolic extracts originated from whole grain: buckwheat > barley > oat > wheat congruent with rye. The antioxidant activity was observed in extract prepared from separated parts of buckwheat and barley. In respect to hulls, the antioxidant hierarchy was as follows: buckwheat > oat > barley. The correlation coefficient between total phenolic compounds and total antioxidative activity of the extracts was -0.35 for water extracts and 0.96, 0.99, 0.80, and 0.99 for 80% methanolic extracts originated from whole grains, hulls, pericarb with testa fractions and endosperm with embryo fractions, respectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Moran, J. F., Klucas, R. V., Grayer, R. J., Abian, J., & Becana, M. (1997) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0891-5849(96)00426-1 · Cited by 369
Chemical composition and protein quality of buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench)
Eggum, B. O., Kreft, I., & Javornik, B. (1981) · Qualitas Plantarum Plant Foods for Human Nutrition · doi:10.1007/bf01094020 · Cited by 113
Cited by
New hypotheses for the health-protective mechanisms of whole-grain cereals: what is beyond fibre?
Fardet, A. (2010) · Nutrition Research Reviews · doi:10.1017/s0954422410000041 · Cited by 1,030
KIM, K., TSAO, R., YANG, R., & CUI, S. (2006) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.01.032 · Cited by 913
Alvarez-Jubete, L., Wijngaard, H., Arendt, E. K., & Gallagher, E. (2010) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.07.032 · Cited by 736
Nutritive value of pseudocereals and their increasing use as functional gluten-free ingredients
Alvarez-Jubete, L., Arendt, E. K., & Gallagher, E. (2010) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2009.10.014 · Cited by 688
Paśko, P., Bartoń, H., Zagrodzki, P., Gorinstein, S., Fołta, M., & Zachwieja, Z. (2009) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.01.037 · Cited by 432
Metadata
- Authors
- Zieliński, H., & Kozłowska, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2000-06-01
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2008-2016
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W2095839624
- Cited by
- 780
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
