The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Variation in Total and Soluble β-Glucan Content in Hulless Barley: Effects of Thermal, Physical, and Enzymic Treatments
Abstract
Total and soluble beta-glucan content and effects of various treatments of barley grain on extractability and molecular characteristics of soluble beta-glucan were studied. Four types of hulless barley (normal, high amylose, waxy, and zero amylose waxy) from 29 registered and experimental genotypes were analyzed. For each, moisture, protein, amylose, 100 kernel weight, starch, beta-glucan (total and soluble), beta-glucanase activity, and slurry viscosity were determined. Significant differences in total beta-glucan were observed among the groups, with average values of 7. 49%, 6.86%, 6.30%, and 4.38% for high amylose, waxy, zero amylose waxy, and normal barley, respectively. The extractability of beta-glucan in high amylose barley was relatively low (20.6-29.7%) compared to that in normal (29.8-44.3%), zero amylose waxy (34.0-52. 5%), and waxy (36.7-52.7%) barley genotypes. Viscosity of barley flour slurries was affected by the content of soluble beta-glucans, beta-glucanase activity, and molecular weight of beta-glucans. Hydrothermal treatments (autoclaving and steaming) of barley had no effect on extractability of beta-glucans, but prevented enzymic hydrolysis of beta-glucans, and thereby substantially improved their molecular weight. The addition of enzymes (protease and esterase) during extraction and/or physical treatments (sonication) increased extractability of beta-glucans from barley.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
New hypotheses for the health-protective mechanisms of whole-grain cereals: what is beyond fibre?
Fardet, A. (2010) · Nutrition Research Reviews · doi:10.1017/s0954422410000041 · Cited by 1,030
Barley for food: Characteristics, improvement, and renewed interest
Baik, B.-K., & Ullrich, S. E. (2008) · Journal of Cereal Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcs.2008.02.002 · Cited by 785
Izydorczyk, M. S., & Dexter, J. E. (2008) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2008.04.001 · Cited by 527
Self-citationEbringerová, A., Hromádková, Z., & Heinze, T. (2005) · Advances in Polymer Science · doi:10.1007/b136816 · Cited by 451
The behavior of dietary fiber in the gastrointestinal tract determines its physiological effect
Capuano, E. (2017) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2016.1180501 · Cited by 438
Metadata
- Authors
- Izydorczyk, M. S., Storsley, J., Labossiere, D., MacGregor, A. W., & Rossnagel, B. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2000-03-28
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 982-989
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W2057922274
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Variation in Total and Soluble β-Glucan Content in Hulless Barley: Effects of Thermal, Physical, and Enzymic Treatments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jf991102f
- The paper
- Izydorczyk, M. S., Storsley, J., Labossiere, D., MacGregor, A. W., & Rossnagel, B. G. (2000). Variation in Total and Soluble β-Glucan Content in Hulless Barley: Effects of Thermal, Physical, and Enzymic Treatments. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf991102f
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.