The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
GRid-INdependent Descriptors (GRIND): A Novel Class of Alignment-Independent Three-Dimensional Molecular Descriptors
Open accessAbstract
Traditional methods for performing 3D-QSAR rely upon an alignment step that is often time-consuming and can introduce user bias, the resultant model being dependent upon and sensitive to the alignment used. There are several methods which overcome this problem, but in general the necessary transformations prevent a simple interpretation of the resultant models in the original descriptor space (i.e. 3D molecular coordinates). Here we present a novel class of molecular descriptors which we have termed GRid-INdependent Descriptors (GRIND). They are derived in such a way as to be highly relevant for describing biological properties of compounds while being alignment-independent, chemically interpretable, and easy to compute. GRIND are obtained starting from a set of molecular interaction fields, computed by the program GRID or by other programs. The procedure for computing the descriptors involves a first step, in which the fields are simplified, and a second step, in which the results are encoded into alignment-independent variables using a particular type of autocorrelation transform. The molecular descriptors so obtained can be used to obtain graphical diagrams called "correlograms" and can be used in different chemometric analyses, such as principal component analysis or partial least-squares. An important feature of GRIND is that, with the use of appropriate software, the original descriptors (molecular interaction fields) can be regenerated from the autocorrelation transform and, thus, the results of the analysis represented graphically, together with the original molecular structures, in 3D plots. In this respect, the article introduces the program ALMOND, a software package developed in our group for the computation, analysis, and interpretation of GRIND. The use of the methodology is illustrated using some examples from the field of 3D-QSAR. Highly predictive and interpretable models are obtained showing the promising potential of the novel descriptors in drug design.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cramer, R. D., Patterson, D. E., & Bunce, J. D. (1988) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00226a005 · Cited by 3,931
Cited by
QSAR Modeling: Where have you been? Where are you going to?
Cherkasov, A., Muratov, E. N., Fourches, D., Varnek, A., Baskin, I. I., Cronin, M., Dearden, J., Gramatica, P., Martin, Y. C., Todeschini, R., et al. (2014) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm4004285 · Cited by 2,164
Virtual and biomolecular screening converge on a selective agonist for GPR30
Bologa, C. G., Revankar, C. M., Young, S. M., Edwards, B. S., Arterburn, J. B., Kiselyov, A. S., Parker, M. A., Tkachenko, S. E., Savchuck, N. P., Sklar, L. A., et al. (2006) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio775 · Cited by 818
Molecular similarity: a key technique in molecular informatics
Bender, A., & Glen, R. C. (2004) · Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry · doi:10.1039/b409813g · Cited by 614
Bender, A., Mussa, H. Y., Glen, R. C., & Reiling, S. (2004) · Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences · doi:10.1021/ci0498719 · Cited by 322
Computational Prediction of Metabolism: Sites, Products, SAR, P450 Enzyme Dynamics, and Mechanisms
Kirchmair, J., Williamson, M. J., Tyzack, J. D., Tan, L., Bond, P. J., Bender, A., & Glen, R. C. (2012) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci200542m · Cited by 289
Metadata
- Authors
- Pastor, M., Cruciani, G., McLay, I., Pickett, S., & Clementi, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2000-08-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 3233-3243
- ISSN
- 0022-2623 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4804
- OpenAlex
- W2056593372
- Cited by
- 467
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.