The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular Docking and High-Throughput Screening for Novel Inhibitors of Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase-1B
Open accessAbstract
High-throughput screening (HTS) of compound libraries is used to discover novel leads for drug development. When a structure is available for the target, computer-based screening using molecular docking may also be considered. The two techniques have rarely been used together on the same target. The opportunity to do so presented itself in a project to discover novel inhibitors for the enzyme protein tyrosine phosphatase-1B (PTP1B), a tyrosine phosphatase that has been implicated as a key target for type II diabetes. A corporate library of approximately 400 000 compounds was screened using high-throughput experimental techniques for compounds that inhibited PTP1B. Concurrently, molecular docking was used to screen approximately 235 000 commercially available compounds against the X-ray crystallographic structure of PTP1B, and 365 high-scoring molecules were tested as inhibitors of the enzyme. Of approximately 400 000 molecules tested in the high-throughput experimental assay, 85 (0.021%) inhibited the enzyme with IC50 values less than 100 microM; the most active had an IC50 value of 4.2 microM. Of the 365 molecules suggested by molecular docking, 127 (34.8%) inhibited PTP1B with IC50 values less than 100 microM; the most active of these had an IC50 of 1.7 microM. Structure-based docking therefore enriched the hit rate by 1700-fold over random screening. The hits from both the high-throughput and docking screens were dissimilar from phosphotyrosine, the canonical substrate group for PTP1B; the two hit lists were also very different from each other. Surprisingly, the docking hits were judged to be more druglike than the HTS hits. The diversity of both hit lists and their dissimilarity from each other suggest that docking and HTS may be complementary techniques for lead discovery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lipinski, C. A., Lombardo, F., Dominy, B. W., & Feeney, P. J. (2001) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0169-409x(00)00129-0 · Cited by 18,139
Lipinski, C. A., Lombardo, F., Dominy, B. W., & Feeney, P. J. (1997) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0169-409x(96)00423-1 · Cited by 11,385
Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking 1 1Edited by F. E. Cohen
Jones, G., Willett, P., Glen, R. C., Leach, A. R., & Taylor, R. (1997) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1996.0897 · Cited by 6,763
A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions
Kuntz, I. D., Blaney, J. M., Oatley, S. J., Langridge, R., & Ferrin, T. E. (1982) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(82)90153-x · Cited by 2,278
Elchebly, M., Payette, P., Michaliszyn, E., Cromlish, W., Collins, S., Loy, A. L., Normandin, D., Cheng, A., Himms-Hagen, J., Chan, C.-C., et al. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.283.5407.1544 · Cited by 2,210
Distributed automated docking of flexible ligands to proteins: Parallel applications of AutoDock 2.4
Morris, G. M., Goodsell, D. S., Huey, R., & Olson, A. J. (1996) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/bf00124499 · Cited by 1,042
Ferrin, T. E., Huang, C. C., Jarvis, L. E., & Langridge, R. (1988) · Journal of Molecular Graphics · doi:10.1016/0263-7855(88)80054-7 · Cited by 950
Automated docking with grid‐based energy evaluation
Meng, E. C., Shoichet, B. K., & Kuntz, I. D. (1992) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.540130412 · Cited by 938
Self-citationComputational methods for biomolecular docking
Lengauer, T., & Rarey, M. (1996) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/s0959-440x(96)80061-3 · Cited by 827
Bissantz, C., Folkers, G., & Rognan, D. (2000) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm001044l · Cited by 740
Cited by
Molecular Docking: A Powerful Approach for Structure-Based Drug Discovery
Meng, X.-Y., Zhang, H.-X., Mezei, M., & Cui, M. (2011) · Current Computer Aided-Drug Design · doi:10.2174/157340911795677602 · Cited by 3,771
SwissDock, a protein-small molecule docking web service based on EADock DSS
Grosdidier, A., Zoete, V., & Michielin, O. (2011) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr366 · Cited by 1,950
Virtual screening of chemical libraries
Shoichet, B. K. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03197 · Cited by 1,425
Self-citationRole of computer-aided drug design in modern drug discovery
Macalino, S. J. Y., Gosu, V., Hong, S., & Choi, S. (2015) · Archives of Pharmacal Research · doi:10.1007/s12272-015-0640-5 · Cited by 762
Computer-aided drug discovery and development (CADDD): in silico-chemico-biological approach
Kapetanovic, I. M. (2008) · Chemico-Biological Interactions · doi:10.1016/j.cbi.2006.12.006 · Cited by 662
Metadata
- Authors
- Doman, T. N., McGovern, S. L., Witherbee, B. J., Kasten, T. P., Kurumbail, R., Stallings, W. C., Connolly, D. T., & Shoichet, B. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-04-20
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2213-2221
- ISSN
- 0022-2623 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4804
- OpenAlex
- W2114212850
- Cited by
- 462
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 25.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular Docking and High-Throughput Screening for Novel Inhibitors of Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase-1B. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jm010548w
- The paper
- Doman, T. N., McGovern, S. L., Witherbee, B. J., Kasten, T. P., Kurumbail, R., Stallings, W. C., Connolly, D. T., & Shoichet, B. K. (2002). Molecular Docking and High-Throughput Screening for Novel Inhibitors of Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase-1B. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm010548w
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.