The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identification and Prediction of Promiscuous Aggregating Inhibitors among Known Drugs
Open accessAbstract
Some small molecules, often hits from screening, form aggregates in solution that inhibit many enzymes. In contrast, drugs are thought to act specifically. To investigate this assumption, 50 unrelated drugs were tested for promiscuous inhibition via aggregation. Each drug was tested against three unrelated model enzymes: beta-lactamase, chymotrypsin, and malate dehydrogenase, none of which are considered targets of these drugs. To be judged promiscuous, the drugs had to inhibit all three enzymes, do so in a time-dependent manner, be sensitive to detergent and to enzyme concentration, and form particles detectable by light scattering. Of the 50 drugs tested, 43 were nonpromiscuous by these criteria. Surprisingly, four of the drugs showed promiscuous, aggregation-based inhibition at concentrations below 100 microM: clotrimazole, benzyl benzoate, nicardipine, and delavirdine. Three other drugs also behaved as aggregation-based inhibitors, but only at high concentrations (about 400 microM). To investigate possible structure-activity relationships among promiscuous drugs, five analogues of the antifungal clotrimazole were studied. Three of these, miconazole, econazole, and sulconazole, were promiscuous but the other two, fluconazole and ketoconazole, were not. Using recursive partitioning, these experimental results were used to develop a model for predicting aggregate-based promiscuity. This model correctly classified 94% of 111 compounds-47 aggregators and 64 nonaggregators-that have been studied for this effect. To evaluate the model, it was used to predict the behavior of 75 drugs not previously investigated for aggregation. Several preliminary points emerge. Most drugs are not promiscuous, even at high concentrations. Nevertheless, at high enough concentrations (20-400 microM), some drugs can aggregate and act promiscuously, suggesting that aggregation may be common among small molecules at micromolar concentrations, at least in biochemical buffers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lipinski, C. A., Lombardo, F., Dominy, B. W., & Feeney, P. J. (2001) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0169-409x(00)00129-0 · Cited by 18,139
Cited by
Small-molecule inhibitors of protein–protein interactions: progressing towards the dream
Arkin, M. R., & Wells, J. A. (2004) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1343 · Cited by 1,705
The role of natural product chemistry in drug discovery
Butler, M. S. (2004) · Journal of Natural Products · doi:10.1021/np040106y · Cited by 1,381
Counting on natural products for drug design
Rodrigues, T., Reker, D., Schneider, P., & Schneider, G. (2016) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.2479 · Cited by 1,250
Targeted drug delivery strategies for precision medicines
Manzari, M. T., Shamay, Y., Kiguchi, H., Rosen, N., Scaltriti, M., & Heller, D. A. (2021) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-020-00269-6 · Cited by 1,183
Twenty years on: the impact of fragments on drug discovery
Erlanson, D. A., Fesik, S. W., Hubbard, R. E., Jahnke, W., & Jhoti, H. (2016) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd.2016.109 · Cited by 1,000
Metadata
- Authors
- Seidler, J., McGovern, S. L., Doman, T. N., & Shoichet, B. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-09-13
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 4477-4486
- ISSN
- 0022-2623 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4804
- OpenAlex
- W2154183412
- Cited by
- 476
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification and Prediction of Promiscuous Aggregating Inhibitors among Known Drugs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jm030191r
- The paper
- Seidler, J., McGovern, S. L., Doman, T. N., & Shoichet, B. K. (2003). Identification and Prediction of Promiscuous Aggregating Inhibitors among Known Drugs. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm030191r
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.