Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 193

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cysteine Mapping in Conformationally Distinct Kinase Nucleotide Binding Sites: Application to the Design of Selective Covalent Inhibitors

Open access
Leproult, Emeline, Barluenga, Sofia, Moras, Dino, Wurtz, Jean-Marie, Winssinger, Nicolas·2011·Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Abstract

Kinases have emerged as one of the most prolific therapeutic targets. An important criterion in the therapeutic success of inhibitors targeting the nucleotide binding pocket of kinases is the inhibitor residence time. Recently, covalent kinase inhibitors have attracted attention since they confer terminal inhibition and should thus be more effective than reversible inhibitors with transient inhibition. The most robust approach to design irreversible inhibitors is to capitalize on the nucleophilicity of a cysteine thiol group present in the target protein. Herein, we report a systematic analysis of cysteine residues present in the nucleotide binding site of kinases, which could be harnessed for irreversible inhibition, taking into consideration the different kinase conformations. We demonstrate the predictive power of this analysis with the design and validation of an irreversible inhibitor of KIT/PDGFR kinases. This is the first example of a covalent kinase inhibitor that combines a pharmacophore addressing the DFG-out conformation with a covalent trap.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jm101396q

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 193

Metadata

Authors
Leproult, E., Barluenga, S., Moras, D., Wurtz, J.-M., & Winssinger, N.
Venue
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Published
2011-02-15
Volume
54
Issue
5
Pages
1347-1355
ISSN
  • 0022-2623 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4804
OpenAlex
W2071648775
Cited by
193
References
8
FWCI
5.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.