The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rules for Identifying Potentially Reactive or Promiscuous Compounds
Open accessAbstract
This article describes a set of 275 rules, developed over an 18-year period, used to identify compounds that may interfere with biological assays, allowing their removal from screening sets. Reasons for rejection include reactivity (e.g., acyl halides), interference with assay measurements (fluorescence, absorbance, quenching), activities that damage proteins (oxidizers, detergents), instability (e.g., latent aldehydes), and lack of druggability (e.g., compounds lacking both oxygen and nitrogen). The structural queries were profiled for frequency of occurrence in druglike and nondruglike compound sets and were extensively reviewed by a panel of experienced medicinal chemists. As a means of profiling the rules and as a filter in its own right, an index of biological promiscuity was developed. The 584 gene targets with screening data at Lilly were assigned to 17 subfamilies, and the number of subfamilies at which a compound was active was used as a promiscuity index. For certain compounds, promiscuous activity disappeared after sample repurification, indicating interference from occult contaminants. Because this type of interference is not amenable to substructure search, a "nuisance list" was developed to flag interfering compounds that passed the substructure rules.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Irreversible Inhibitors of Serine, Cysteine, and Threonine Proteases
Powers, J. C., Asgian, J. L., Ekici, Ö. D., & James, K. E. (2002) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr010182v · Cited by 1,090
Cited by
Daina, A., Michielin, O., & Zoete, V. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep42717 · Cited by 18,367
Ertl, P., Altmann, E., & McKenna, J. M. (2020) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c00754 · Cited by 429
The Synthesizability of Molecules Proposed by Generative Models
Gao, W., & Coley, C. W. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00174 · Cited by 394
Lagorce, D., Douguet, D., Miteva, M. A., & Villoutreix, B. O. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep46277 · Cited by 266
Judson, R., Houck, K., Martin, M., Richard, A. M., Knudsen, T. B., Shah, I., Little, S., Wambaugh, J., Woodrow Setzer, R., Kothya, P., et al. (2016) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfw092 · Cited by 232
Metadata
- Authors
- Bruns, R. F., & Watson, I. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-10-25
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 9763-9772
- ISSN
- 0022-2623 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4804
- OpenAlex
- W2069126953
- Cited by
- 338
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rules for Identifying Potentially Reactive or Promiscuous Compounds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jm301008n
- The paper
- Bruns, R. F., & Watson, I. A. (2012). Rules for Identifying Potentially Reactive or Promiscuous Compounds. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm301008n
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.