The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Promiscuity and Selectivity in Covalent Enzyme Inhibition: A Systematic Study of Electrophilic Fragments
Abstract
Covalent ligand-target interactions offer significant pharmacological advantages. However, off-target reactivity of the reactive groups, which usually have electrophilic properties, must be minimized, and the selectivity of irreversible inhibitors is a crucial requirement. We therefore performed a systematic study to determine the selectivity of several electrophilic groups that can be used as building blocks for covalently binding ligands. Six reactive groups with modulated electrophilicity were combined with 11 nonreactive moieties, resulting in a small combinatorial library of 72 fragment-like compounds. These compounds were screened against a group of 11 enzyme targets to assess their selectivity and their potential for promiscuous binding to proteins. The assay results showed a considerably lower degree of promiscuity than initially expected, even for those members of the screening collection that contain supposedly highly reactive electrophiles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The resurgence of covalent drugs
Singh, J., Petter, R. C., Baillie, T. A., & Whitty, A. (2011) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd3410 · Cited by 1,873
Drug-target residence time and its implications for lead optimization
Copeland, R. A., Pompliano, D. L., & Meek, T. D. (2006) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd2082 · Cited by 1,464
Strategies for Discovering and Derisking Covalent, Irreversible Enzyme Inhibitors
Johnson, D. S., Weerapana, E., & Cravatt, B. F. (2010) · Future Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.4155/fmc.10.21 · Cited by 387
Cited by
The Essential Medicinal Chemistry of Curcumin
Nelson, K. M., Dahlin, J. L., Bisson, J., Graham, J., Pauli, G. F., & Walters, M. A. (2017) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b00975 · Cited by 1,956
Counting on natural products for drug design
Rodrigues, T., Reker, D., Schneider, P., & Schneider, G. (2016) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.2479 · Cited by 1,250
Proteome-wide covalent ligand discovery in native biological systems
Backus, K. M., Correia, B. E., Lum, K. M., Forli, S., Horning, B. D., González-Páez, G. E., Chatterjee, S., Lanning, B. R., Teijaro, J. R., Olson, A. J., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature18002 · Cited by 940
Targeted Covalent Inhibitors for Drug Design
Baillie, T. A. (2016) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201601091 · Cited by 578
Bauer, R. A. (2015) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2015.05.005 · Cited by 534
Metadata
- Authors
- Jöst, C., Nitsche, C., Scholz, T., Roux, L., & Klein, C. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-09-05
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 7590-7599
- ISSN
- 0022-2623 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4804
- OpenAlex
- W2319201708
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.