The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evolutionary Optimization in Quantitative Structure−Activity Relationship: An Application of Genetic Neural Networks
Abstract
A new hybrid method (GNN) combining a genetic algorithm and an artificial neural network has been developed for quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) studies. A suitable set of molecular descriptors are selected by a genetic algorithm. This set serves as input to a neural network, in which model-free mapping of multivariate data is performed. Multiple predictors are generated that are superior to results obtained from previous studies of the Selwood data set, which is used to test the method. The neural network technique provides a graphical description of the functional form of the descriptors that play an important role in determining drug activity. This can serve as an aid in future design of drug analogues. The effectiveness of GNN is tested by comparing its results with a benchmark obtained by exhaustive enumeration. Different fitness strategies that tune the evolution of genetic models are examined, and QSARs with higher predictiveness are found. From these results, a composite model is constructed by averaging predictions from several high-ranking models. The predictions of the resulting QSAR should be more reliable than those derived from a single predictor because it makes greater use of information and also permits error estimation. An analysis of the sets of descriptors selected by GNN shows that it is essential to have one each for the steric, electrostatic, and hydrophobic attributes of a drug candidate to obtain a satisfactory QSAR for this data set. This type of result is expected to be of general utility in designing and understanding QSAR.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Learning Internal Representations by Error Propagation
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1985) · doi:10.21236/ada164453 · Cited by 16,172
Introduction to the Theory of Neural Computation
Hertz, J., Krogh, A., & Palmer, R. G. (2018) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780429499661 · Cited by 1,772
QSAR: Hansch Analysis and Related Approaches
Kubinyi, H. (1993) · Methods and Principles in Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1002/9783527616824 · Cited by 697
Neural Networks for Chemists: An Introduction
Zupan, J., & Gasteiger, J. (1993) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 560
Chemometric Methods in Molecular Design
(1995) · Methods and Principles in Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1002/9783527615452 · Cited by 330
Andrea, T. A., & Kalayeh, H. (1991) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm00113a022 · Cited by 287
Applications of artificial intelligence in chemistry
Wellawatte, G. P., & White, A. D. (1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-1541 · Cited by 135
Selwood, D. L., Livingstone, D. J., Comley, J. C. W., O'Dowd, A., Hudson, A. T., Jackson, P., Jandu, K. S., Rose, V. S., & Stables, J. N. (1990) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm00163a023 · Cited by 127
Nonlinear multivariate mapping of chemical data using feed-forward neural networks
Blank, T. B., & Brown, S. D. (1993) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac00069a023 · Cited by 102
Analysis of linear and nonlinear QSAR data using neural networks
Manallack, D. T., Ellis, D. D., & Livingstone, D. J. (1994) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm00048a012 · Cited by 85
Cited by
Neural network potential-energy surfaces in chemistry: a tool for large-scale simulations
Behler, J. (2011) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c1cp21668f · Cited by 781
Zheng, W., & Tropsha, A. (2000) · Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences · doi:10.1021/ci980033m · Cited by 450
Automatic Method for Identifying Reaction Coordinates in Complex Systems
Ma, A., & Dinner, A. R. (2005) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp045546c · Cited by 400
Rohrdanz, M. A., Zheng, W., & Clementi, C. (2013) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-physchem-040412-110006 · Cited by 242
Leander, M., Liu, Z., Cui, Q., & Raman, S. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.79932 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- So, S.-S., & Karplus, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1996-01-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1521-1530
- ISSN
- 0022-2623 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4804
- OpenAlex
- W1965807998
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 9.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolutionary Optimization in Quantitative Structure−Activity Relationship: An Application of Genetic Neural Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jm9507035
- The paper
- So, S.-S., & Karplus, M. (1996). Evolutionary Optimization in Quantitative Structure−Activity Relationship: An Application of Genetic Neural Networks. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm9507035
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.