Cited by 54Protein Structure and DynamicsBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyEnzyme Structure and Function

Deep mutational scanning and machine learning reveal structural and molecular rules governing allosteric hotspots in homologous proteins

Open access
Leander, Megan, Liu, Zhuang, Cui, Qiang, Raman, Srivatsan·2022·eLife

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

A fundamental question in protein science is where allosteric hotspots – residues critical for allosteric signaling – are located, and what properties differentiate them. We carried out deep mutational scanning (DMS) of four homologous bacterial allosteric transcription factors (aTFs) to identify hotspots and built a machine learning model with this data to glean the structural and molecular properties of allosteric hotspots. We found hotspots to be distributed protein-wide rather than being restricted to ‘pathways’ linking allosteric and active sites as is commonly assumed. Despite structural homology, the location of hotspots was not superimposable across the aTFs. However, common signatures emerged when comparing hotspots coincident with long-range interactions, suggesting that the allosteric mechanism is conserved among the homologs despite differences in molecular details. Machine learning with our large DMS datasets revealed global structural and dynamic properties to be a strong predictor of whether a residue is a hotspot than local and physicochemical properties. Furthermore, a model trained on one protein can predict hotspots in a homolog. In summary, the overall allosteric mechanism is embedded in the structural fold of the aTF family, but the finer, molecular details are sequence-specific.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7554/elife.79932

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leander, M., Liu, Z., Cui, Q., & Raman, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Cui, Qiang
  • Raman, Srivatsan
Venue
eLife
Published
2022-10-13
Volume
11
ISSN
2050-084X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4304944453
Cited by
54
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 2
FWCI
3.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (DP2GM132682, R35GM141930, T32GM08293)
  • The Camille and Henry Dreyfus Foundations, Inc (ML-21-016)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
allosteric hotspots, allosteric communication, deep mutational scanning, long-range interactions, structural homology, protein dynamics
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Allosteric Regulation, Mutation, Proteins, Signal Transduction, Molecular Dynamics Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review