The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Selecting Optimally Diverse Compounds from Structure Databases: A Validation Study of Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Molecular Descriptors
Abstract
The efficiency of the drug discovery process can be significantly improved using design techniques to maximize the diversity of structure databases or combinatorial libraries. Here, several physicochemical descriptors were investigated to quantify molecular diversity. Based on the 2D or 3D topological similarity of molecules, the relationship between physicochemical metrics and biological activity was studied to find valid descriptors. Several compounds were selected using those descriptors from a database containing diverse templates and 55 biological classes. It was evaluated whether the obtained subsets represent all biological properties and structural variations of the original database. In addition, hierarchical cluster analyses were used to group molecules from the parent database, which should have similar biological properties. Using various sets of structurally similar molecules, it was possible to derive quantitative measures for compound similarities in relation to biological properties. A similarity radius for 2D fingerprints and molecular steric fields was estimated; compounds within this radius of another molecule were shown to have comparable biological properties. This study demonstrates that 2D fingerprints alone or in combination with other metrics as the primary descriptor allow to handle global diversity. In addition, standard atom-pair descriptors or molecular steric fields can be used to correlate structural diversity with biological activity. Hence, the latter two descriptors can be classified as secondary descriptors useful for analog library design, while 2D fingerprints are applicable to design a general library for lead discovery. Based on these findings, an optimally diverse subset containing only 38% of the entire IC93 database was generated using 2D fingerprints. Here no structure is more similar than 0.85 to any other (Tanimoto coefficient), but all biological classes were selected. This reduction of redundancy led to a child database with the same physicochemical diversity space, which contains the same information as the original database.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cramer, R. D., Patterson, D. E., & Bunce, J. D. (1988) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00226a005 · Cited by 3,931
Cited by
Relating protein pharmacology by ligand chemistry
Keiser, M. J., Roth, B. L., Armbruster, B. N., Ernsberger, P., Irwin, J. J., & Shoichet, B. K. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1284 · Cited by 2,402
Reoptimization of MDL Keys for Use in Drug Discovery
Durant, J. L., Leland, B. A., Henry, D. R., & Nourse, J. G. (2002) · Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences · doi:10.1021/ci010132r · Cited by 1,862
Benchmarking sets for molecular docking.
Huang, N., Shoichet, B. K., & Irwin, J. J. (2006) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm0608356 · Cited by 1,318
Integration of virtual and high-throughput screening
Bajorath, J. (2002) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd941 · Cited by 930
Similarity-based virtual screening using 2D fingerprints
Willett, P. (2006) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2006.10.005 · Cited by 849
Do Structurally Similar Molecules Have Similar Biological Activity?
Martin, Y. C., Kofron, J. L., & Traphagen, L. M. (2002) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm020155c · Cited by 806
Molecular Shape Diversity of Combinatorial Libraries: A Prerequisite for Broad Bioactivity
Sauer, W. H. B., & Schwarz, M. K. (2003) · Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences · doi:10.1021/ci025599w · Cited by 498
Can We Learn To Distinguish between “Drug-like” and “Nondrug-like” Molecules?
Ajay, Walters, W. P., & Murcko, M. A. (1998) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm970666c · Cited by 484
Kornhuber, J., Tripal, P., Reichel, M., Mühle, C., Rhein, C., Muehlbacher, M., Groemer, T. W., & Gulbins, E. (2010) · Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1159/000315101 · Cited by 354
Sastry, M., Lowrie, J. F., Dixon, S. L., & Sherman, W. (2010) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci100062n · Cited by 332
Tice, C. M. (2001) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/1526-4998(200101)57:1<3::aid-ps269>3.0.co;2-6 · Cited by 306
Virshup, A. M., Contreras-García, J., Wipf, P., Yang, W., & Beratan, D. N. (2013) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja401184g · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Matter, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1997-04-01
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1219-1229
- ISSN
- 0022-2623 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4804
- OpenAlex
- W1981214699
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.