Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 165

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Predicting Binding Affinities of Protein Ligands from Three-Dimensional Models: Application to Peptide Binding to Class I Major Histocompatibility Proteins

Rognan, Didier, Lauemøller, Sanne Lise, Holm, Arne, Buus, Søren, Tschinke, Vincenzo·1999·Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Abstract

A simple and fast free energy scoring function (Fresno) has been developed to predict the binding free energy of peptides to class I major histocompatibility (MHC) proteins. It differs from existing scoring functions mainly by the explicit treatment of ligand desolvation and of unfavorable protein-ligand contacts. Thus, it may be particularly useful in predicting binding affinities from three-dimensional models of protein-ligand complexes. The Fresno function was independently calibrated for two different training sets: (a) five HLA-A0201-peptide structures, which had been determined by X-ray crystallography, and (b) three-dimensional models of 37 H-2K(k)-peptide structures, which had been obtained by knowledge-based homology modeling. For both training sets, a good cross-validated fit to experimental binding free energies was obtained with predictive errors of 3-3.5 kJ/mol. As expected, lipophilic interactions were found to contribute the most to HLA-A0201-peptide interactions, whereas H-bonding predominates in H-2K(k) recognition. Both cross-validated models were afterward used to predict the binding affinity of a test set of 26 peptides to HLA-A0204 (an HLA allele closely related to HLA-A0201) and of a series of 16 peptides to H-2K(k). Predictions were more accurate for HLA-A2-binding peptides as the training set had been built from experimentally determined structures. The average error in predicting the binding free energy of the test peptides was 3.1 kJ/mol. For the homology model-derived equation, the average error in predicting the binding free energy of peptides to K(k) was significantly higher (5.4 kJ/mol) but still very acceptable. The present scoring function is thus able to predict with a good accuracy binding free energies from three-dimensional models, at the condition that the backbone coordinates of the MHC-bound peptide have first been determined with an accuracy of about 1-1.5 A. Furthermore, it may be easily recalibrated for any protein-ligand complex.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jm9910775

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 165

Metadata

Authors
Rognan, D., Lauemøller, S. L., Holm, A., Buus, S., & Tschinke, V.
Venue
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Published
1999-10-01
Volume
42
Issue
22
Pages
4650-4658
ISSN
  • 0022-2623 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4804
OpenAlex
W1984078422
Cited by
165
References
1
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.