The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Extension of the Self-Consistent Spectrophotometric Basicity Scale in Acetonitrile to a Full Span of 28 p Ka Units: Unification of Different Basicity Scales
Abstract
The earlier compiled self-consistent spectrophotometric basicity scale in acetonitrile (AN) was expanded to range from 3.8 to 32.0 pK(a) units, that is 28 orders of magnitude. Altogether 54 new relative basicity measurements (DeltapK(a) measurements) were carried out and 37 new compounds were introduced to the scale (it now includes altogether 89 bases). The relative basicity of any two bases in the scale can be obtained by combining at least two independent sets of measurements. Multiple overlapping measurements make the results more reliable. The overall consistency (as defined earlier) of the measurements is s = 0.03 pK(a) units. Thorough analysis of all of our experimental data (DeltapK(a) values of this and earlier works) and experimental pK(a) data in AN available in the literature (works from the groups of Coetzee and Padmanabhan, Kolthoff and Chantooni, Jr., the Schwesinger group, Bren' et al. and some others, altogether 19 papers) was carried out. On the basis of this analysis the anchor point of the scale-pyridine-was shifted upward by 0.20 pK(a) units thereby also revising the absolute pK(a) values of all the bases on the scale. This way very good agreement between our relative data and the absolute pK(a) values of the abovementioned authors was obtained. The revised basicity scale was interconnected with the earlier published self-consistent acidity scale by DeltapK(a) measurements between acids and bases. The rms deviation between the directly measured DeltapK(a) values and the absolute pK(a) values of the compounds was 0.10 pK(a) units.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Organocatalytic Ring-Opening Polymerization
Kamber, N. E., Jeong, W., Waymouth, R. M., Pratt, R. C., Lohmeijer, B. G. G., & Hedrick, J. L. (2007) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr068415b · Cited by 1,489
Organocatalysis: Opportunities and Challenges for Polymer Synthesis
Kiesewetter, M. K., Shin, E. J., Hedrick, J. L., & Waymouth, R. M. (2010) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma9025948 · Cited by 907
Transforming polylactide into value‐added materials
Leibfarth, F. A., Moreno, N., Hawker, A. P., & Shand, J. D. (2012) · Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry · doi:10.1002/pola.26303 · Cited by 139
TBD catalysis with dimethyl carbonate: a fruitful and sustainable alliance
Mutlu, H., Ruiz, J., Solleder, S. C., & Meier, M. A. R. (2012) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c2gc35191a · Cited by 116
Sherck, N. J., Kim, H. C., & Won, Y.-Y. (2016) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.6b00621 · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaljurand, I., Kütt, A., Sooväli, L., Rodima, T., Mäemets, V., Leito, I., & Koppel, I. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Organic Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-01-12
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1019-1028
- ISSN
- 0022-3263 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6904
- OpenAlex
- W2070127123
- Cited by
- 962
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extension of the Self-Consistent Spectrophotometric Basicity Scale in Acetonitrile to a Full Span of 28 p Ka Units: Unification of Different Basicity Scales. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jo048252w
- The paper
- Kaljurand, I., Kütt, A., Sooväli, L., Rodima, T., Mäemets, V., Leito, I., & Koppel, I. A. (2005). Extension of the Self-Consistent Spectrophotometric Basicity Scale in Acetonitrile to a Full Span of 28 p Ka Units: Unification of Different Basicity Scales. The Journal of Organic Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo048252w
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.